Seek Returns

CLS vs. MRVL: Celestica vs. Marvell Stock Comparison

How do Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL) share the Information Technology sector but sit in different industry groups — CLS in Technology Hardware & Equipment and MRVL in Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment.

Company profile comparison for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL)
Profile ItemCLSMRVL
NameCelestica Inc.Marvell Technology Inc.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupTechnology Hardware & EquipmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS Sub-IndustryElectronic Manufacturing ServicesSemiconductors
Market Capitalization26.06 billion USD127.05 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateJune 30, 1998June 30, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CLS
MRVL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL)
MetricCLSMRVL
Total Return (1Y)-30.98%70.03%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)108.72%43.66%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)80.82%16.59%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CLS
MRVL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL)
MetricCLSMRVL
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)80.89%85.27%
Beta (5Y)2.162.38
Max Drawdown (5Y)-56.47%-61.88%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.61M23.80M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CLS and MRVL are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. Each dashed Capital Allocation Line uses that stock's own industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL)
MetricCLSMRVL
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.440.77
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.591.18

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Celestica (CLS) at 30.23% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Marvell (MRVL) at 16.52% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CLS.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

30.23%

Max
42.47%
CLS
30.23%
Q3
19.13%
Median
11.00%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-20.62%

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

16.52%

Max
52.82%
Q3
22.26%
MRVL
16.52%
Median
10.58%
Q1
1.29%
Min
-16.89%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their ROE against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Celestica (CLS) at 6.83% and Marvell (MRVL) at 27.94% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

6.83%

Max
27.60%
Q3
11.66%
CLS
6.83%
Median
4.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-11.02%

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

27.94%

Max
63.80%
Q3
28.36%
MRVL
27.94%
Median
11.44%
Q1
0.90%
Min
-37.77%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their net margin against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Celestica (CLS) at 7.91% and Marvell (MRVL) at 16.68% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

7.91%

Max
36.27%
Q3
18.36%
Median
8.84%
CLS
7.91%
Q1
1.46%
Min
-21.39%

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

16.68%

Max
58.66%
Q3
30.23%
MRVL
16.68%
Median
15.91%
Q1
7.54%
Min
-25.74%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their operating margin against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL)
MetricCLSMRVL
ROE (TTM)30.23%16.52%
ROA (TTM)8.72%4.13%
Net Margin (TTM)6.83%27.94%
Operating Margin (TTM)7.91%16.68%
Gross Margin (TTM)11.46%52.22%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Celestica (CLS) at 28.46% and Marvell (MRVL) at 42.09% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.

Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Celestica (CLS) reports EPS growth of 98.34%, ranked against its industry; Marvell (MRVL) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL)
MetricCLSMRVL
Revenue Growth (YoY)28.46%42.09%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)19.56%11.45%
EPS Growth (YoY)98.34%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)82.39%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Celestica (CLS) at 1.61 and Marvell (MRVL) at 3.17 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.61

Max
5.34
Q3
3.02
Median
1.95
CLS
1.61
Q1
1.32
Min
0.17

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

3.17

Max
10.33
Q3
5.62
Median
3.33
MRVL
3.17
Q1
2.35
Min
1.03
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their current ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Celestica (CLS) at 0.17 and Marvell (MRVL) at 0.29 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.17

Max
1.76
Q3
0.78
Median
0.24
CLS
0.17
Q1
0.04
Min
0.01

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.29

Max
1.46
Q3
0.65
MRVL
0.29
Median
0.27
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL)
MetricCLSMRVL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.613.17
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.170.29
Net Debt / EBITDA-1.720.47

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Celestica (CLS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Marvell (MRVL) reports a yield of 0.18%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max
0.73%
Q3
0.31%
CLS
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.18%

Max
1.37%
Q3
0.65%
MRVL
0.18%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their dividend yield against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Celestica (CLS) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Marvell (MRVL) reports a payout of 7.89%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max
32.27%
Q3
14.48%
CLS
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

7.89%

Max
49.64%
Q3
21.71%
MRVL
7.89%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their payout ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL)
MetricCLSMRVL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%7.89%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Celestica (CLS) at 19.50 and Marvell (MRVL) at 46.45 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

19.50

Max
69.48
Q3
41.02
Median
26.39
CLS
19.50
Q1
19.36
Min
6.07

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

46.45

Max
110.34
Q3
66.81
MRVL
46.45
Median
37.02
Q1
23.96
Min
8.12
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their P/E ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Celestica (CLS) at 1.43 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Marvell (MRVL) at 13.44 sits in the pricier quartile — MRVL costs more per dollar of sales.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.43

Max
11.30
Q3
5.82
Median
2.56
CLS
1.43
Q1
1.05
Min
0.00

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

13.44

Max
21.42
MRVL
13.44
Q3
12.27
Median
5.76
Q1
2.73
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their P/S ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 4.19 and Marvell (MRVL) at 6.68 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

4.19

Max
10.75
Q3
5.52
CLS
4.19
Median
3.17
Q1
1.79
Min
0.33

MRVL

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

6.68

Max
14.06
Q3
7.44
MRVL
6.68
Median
4.29
Q1
2.30
Min
0.20
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. Marvell (MRVL): A comparison of their P/B ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmarks.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Celestica (CLS) and Marvell (MRVL)
MetricCLSMRVL
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.5046.45
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.4313.44
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.196.68
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.08%1.90%