AVGO vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AVGO and MRVL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
AVGO’s market capitalization of 1,222.18 billion USD is substantially larger than MRVL’s 56.18 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.
MRVL carries a higher beta at 1.76, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AVGO (beta: 1.12) exhibits greater stability.
| Symbol | AVGO | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Broadcom Inc. | Marvell Technology, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Hock E. Tan | Mr. Matthew J. Murphy |
| Price | 259.93 USD | 65.16 USD |
| Market Cap | 1,222.18 billion USD | 56.18 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.12 | 1.76 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | August 6, 2009 | June 30, 2000 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AVGO and MRVL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of AVGO and MRVL. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- AVGO’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 121.15 is very high, indicating its stock trades at a significant premium to its earnings, possibly due to strong investor sentiment or high growth expectations. MRVL’s P/E ratio of -114.65 is negative, signaling it is currently unprofitable.
- AVGO’s Forward PEG ratio of 6.10 is very high, suggesting its stock might be overvalued if its price has substantially outrun its future earnings growth forecast. MRVL’s Forward PEG ratio of -7.54 is negative, often an indicator of issues such as negative current earnings or anticipated earnings contraction, which calls its fundamental valuation into question.
| Symbol | AVGO | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 121.15 | -114.65 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 6.10 | -7.54 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 22.41 | 8.64 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 17.49 | -- |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 50.23 | 477.25 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 23.46 | 8.96 |
Dividend Comparison
AVGO’s dividend yield of 0.86% is notably higher than MRVL’s 0.37%, suggesting a stronger emphasis on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AVGO | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.86% | 0.37% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section evaluates the financial strength of AVGO and MRVL. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.
- MRVL’s Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR) of -2.17 is negative. This signals that its current operating earnings are insufficient to meet its interest obligations, a critical red flag for its financial health and capacity to manage its debt.
| Symbol | AVGO | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.00 | -- |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | -- |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.95 | -- |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.40 | -- |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 2.25 | 17.13 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.03 | -2.17 |