AAPL vs. CLS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AAPL dwarfs CLS in market cap, clocking in at 3,018.38 billion USD—about 230.19 times the 13.11 billion USD of its counterpart.

AAPL at 1.27 and CLS at 1.50 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and CLS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and CLS, please refer to the table below.

Dividend Comparison

AAPL’s 0.50% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike CLS, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits AAPL’s balanced approach against CLS’s long-term focus.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and CLS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• AAPL posts a current ratio of 0.82 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to CLS, sitting at 1.43, where liabilities are comfortably met.
• AAPL’s quick ratio sits at 0.78 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, CLS lands at 0.85, with enough liquidity to spare.
• AAPL posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while CLS at 12.39 handles interest with solid earnings.