CHYM vs. NMR: Chime Financial vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Chime Financial (CHYM) and Nomura (NMR) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CHYM is classified in Financial Services while NMR is classified in Capital Markets.

Nomura (NMR) carries decades of public-market history since December 17, 2001, while Chime Financial (CHYM) listed on June 12, 2025 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the NMR side.

Chime Financial (CHYM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Chime Financial (CHYM) at 5.38% and Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Chime Financial (CHYM) at 3.05% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Both Chime Financial (CHYM) at 20.88% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Chime Financial (CHYM) at 30.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for CHYM.

Only one side can be read here: Nomura (NMR) reports EPS growth of 7.17%, ranked against its industry; Chime Financial (CHYM) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Chime Financial (CHYM) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Chime Financial (CHYM) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Chime Financial (CHYM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports a yield of 620.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Chime Financial (CHYM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports a payout of 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Chime Financial (CHYM) at 27.48 sits in the richer quartile — CHYM needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Chime Financial (CHYM) at 4.57 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Chime Financial (CHYM) at 7.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — CHYM is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics