CG vs. UBS: Carlyle vs. UBS Stock Comparison
How do Carlyle (CG) and UBS (UBS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carlyle (CG) and UBS (UBS) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CG is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while UBS falls under Diversified Capital Markets.
| Profile Item | CG | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Carlyle Group Inc. | UBS Group AG |
| Country/Region | United States | Switzerland |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Asset Management & Custody Banks | Diversified Capital Markets |
| Market Capitalization | 14.04 billion USD | 144.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 3, 2012 | May 16, 2000 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CG | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -17.79% | 30.78% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.29% | 29.39% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -3.77% | 25.00% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CG | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.89% | 27.78% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.82 | 1.15 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.75% | -32.48% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.48M | 1.93M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CG | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.58 | 0.95 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.81 | 1.44 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Carlyle (CG) earns 5.23% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; UBS (UBS) has no ROE this period.
CG
Financial Services industry group
5.23%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- CG
- 5.23%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
--
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
- UBS
- --
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Carlyle (CG) at 12.81% and UBS (UBS) at 18.18% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CG
Financial Services industry group
12.81%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- CG
- 12.81%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
18.18%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- UBS
- 18.18%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Carlyle (CG) reports a negative operating margin of -52.93%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile UBS (UBS) reports 27.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CG
Financial Services industry group
-52.93%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
- CG
- -52.93%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
27.10%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- UBS
- 27.10%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CG | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.23% | -- |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.27% | -- |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.81% | 18.18% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -52.93% | 27.10% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
UBS (UBS) at 4.30% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlyle (CG) at -5.56% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
UBS (UBS) at 55.26% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Carlyle (CG) at -21.30% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for UBS.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CG | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.56% | 4.30% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.43% | 12.44% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -21.30% | 55.26% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.34% | 1.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and UBS (UBS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and UBS (UBS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CG | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
UBS (UBS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Carlyle (CG) reports a yield of 3.50%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CG
Financial Services industry group
3.50%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- CG
- 3.50%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- UBS
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Carlyle (CG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.37%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile UBS (UBS) reports 36.30%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CG
Financial Services industry group
147.37%
- Max
- 241.07%
- CG
- 147.37%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UBS
Financial Services industry group
36.30%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- UBS
- 36.30%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CG | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.50% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 147.37% | 36.30% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
UBS (UBS) at 15.77 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Carlyle (CG) at 40.93 sits in the richer quartile — CG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CG
Financial Services industry group
40.93
- Max
- 45.85
- CG
- 40.93
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
UBS
Financial Services industry group
15.77
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- UBS
- 15.77
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
UBS (UBS) at 2.71 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Carlyle (CG) at 5.06 sits in the pricier quartile — CG costs more per dollar of sales.
CG
Financial Services industry group
5.06
- Max
- 9.23
- CG
- 5.06
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
UBS
Financial Services industry group
2.71
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- UBS
- 2.71
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Carlyle (CG) at 2.81 and UBS (UBS) at 1.64 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CG
Financial Services industry group
2.81
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- CG
- 2.81
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
UBS
Financial Services industry group
1.64
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- UBS
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CG | UBS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 40.93 | 15.77 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.06 | 2.71 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.81 | 1.64 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |