CCK vs. SHW: Crown Holdings vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do Crown Holdings (CCK) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Crown Holdings (CCK) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CCK is classified in Containers & Packaging while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | CCK | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Crown Holdings Inc. | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Containers & Packaging | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Metal, Glass & Plastic Containers | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 13.11 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CCK | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 28.01% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.05% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 4.17% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CCK | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.51% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -48.28% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 877.28K | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CCK | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.93 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.46 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Crown Holdings (CCK) at 27.13% also sits in the top quartile.
CCK
Materials industry group
27.13%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CCK
- 27.13%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 5.78% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CCK
Materials industry group
5.78%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- CCK
- 5.78%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 11.96% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CCK
Materials industry group
11.96%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- CCK
- 11.96%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CCK | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.13% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.05% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.78% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.96% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.18% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.78% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 79.72% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CCK | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.78% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.51% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 79.72% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.12% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.14 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.14
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- CCK
- 1.14
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but SHW is more stretched: Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.75 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 is above its industry benchmark range.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.75
- Max
- 1.98
- CCK
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CCK | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.14 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.75 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.08% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.08%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- CCK
- 1.08%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 18.27% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CCK
Materials industry group
18.27%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- CCK
- 18.27%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CCK | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.08% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 18.27% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 16.92 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CCK
Materials industry group
16.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- CCK
- 16.92
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 0.95 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CCK
Materials industry group
0.95
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CCK
- 0.95
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.41 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CCK
Materials industry group
4.41
- Max
- 6.59
- CCK
- 4.41
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CCK | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.92 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.95 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.41 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 2.98% |