CCK vs. RIO: Crown Holdings vs. Rio Tinto Stock Comparison
How do Crown Holdings (CCK) and Rio Tinto (RIO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Crown Holdings (CCK) and Rio Tinto (RIO) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CCK is classified in Containers & Packaging while RIO is classified in Metals & Mining.
Crown Holdings (CCK) trades as ordinary local shares, while Rio Tinto (RIO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CCK | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Crown Holdings Inc. | Rio Tinto plc ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Containers & Packaging | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Metal, Glass & Plastic Containers | Diversified Metals & Mining |
| Market Capitalization | 13.11 billion USD | 136.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | June 28, 1990 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CCK | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 28.01% | 30.54% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.05% | 16.90% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 4.17% | 14.68% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CCK | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.51% | 30.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.63 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -48.28% | -35.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 877.28K | 2.35M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CCK | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.93 | 0.85 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.46 | 1.26 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 27.13% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.31% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CCK.
CCK
Materials industry group
27.13%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CCK
- 27.13%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RIO
- 19.31%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.59% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Crown Holdings (CCK) at 5.78%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CCK
Materials industry group
5.78%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- CCK
- 5.78%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.59%
- Max
- 38.66%
- RIO
- 19.59%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 11.96% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 28.05% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CCK
Materials industry group
11.96%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- CCK
- 11.96%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
RIO
Materials industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- RIO
- 28.05%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CCK | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.13% | 19.31% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.05% | 8.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.78% | 19.59% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.96% | 28.05% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.18% | 29.75% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.78% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 7.42% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 79.72% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at -13.97% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CCK | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.78% | 7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.51% | 1.24% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 79.72% | -13.97% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.12% | -7.23% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.14 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 1.42 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.14
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- CCK
- 1.14
- Min
- 0.16
RIO
Materials industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- RIO
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 0.32 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.75
- Max
- 1.98
- CCK
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- RIO
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CCK | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.14 | 1.42 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.75 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 0.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.08% pays an industry-typical yield; Rio Tinto (RIO) at 5.59% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.08%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- CCK
- 1.08%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
5.59%
- RIO
- 5.59%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 18.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 54.46% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CCK
Materials industry group
18.27%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- CCK
- 18.27%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
54.46%
- Max
- 83.62%
- RIO
- 54.46%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CCK | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.08% | 5.59% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 18.27% | 54.46% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 11.35 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 16.92 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for RIO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CCK
Materials industry group
16.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- CCK
- 16.92
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
RIO
Materials industry group
11.35
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- RIO
- 11.35
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 0.95 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.20 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CCK
Materials industry group
0.95
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CCK
- 0.95
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
2.20
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- RIO
- 2.20
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.08 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.41 carries an above-peer premium to book — CCK is pricier on assets.
CCK
Materials industry group
4.41
- Max
- 6.59
- CCK
- 4.41
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
RIO
Materials industry group
2.08
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- RIO
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CCK | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.92 | 11.35 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.95 | 2.20 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.41 | 2.08 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 2.64% |