CAG vs. CL: Conagra Brands vs. Colgate-Palmolive Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL) share the Consumer Staples sector but sit in different industry groups — CAG in Food, Beverage & Tobacco and CL in Household & Personal Products.

Company profile comparison for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Profile Item	CAG	CL
Name	Conagra Brands Inc.	Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Staples	Consumer Staples
GICS Industry Group	Food, Beverage & Tobacco	Household & Personal Products
GICS Industry	Food Products	Household Products
GICS Sub-Industry	Packaged Foods & Meats	Household Products
Market Capitalization	7.28 billion USD	76.76 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	May 2, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CAG

GSPC

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Metric	CAG	CL
Total Return (1Y)	-4.61%	26.99%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	-13.13%	11.69%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	-9.47%	7.10%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CAG

GSPC

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative beta of -0.00, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Colgate-Palmolive (CL) has a non-negative beta of 0.30.

Risk profile metrics for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Metric	CAG	CL
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	32.65%	23.50%
Beta (5Y)	-0.00	0.30
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-62.52%	-29.05%
Avg. Volume (3M)	11.44M	4.79M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CAG and CL are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. Each dashed Capital Allocation Line uses that stock's own industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Metric	CAG	CL
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.27	0.97
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.40	1.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative ROE of -24.89%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Colgate-Palmolive (CL) reports 231.74%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

-24.89%

Max: 32.02%
Q3: 16.61%
Median: 10.05%
Q1: 4.10%
Min: -10.50%
CAG: -24.89%

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

231.74%

CL: 231.74%
Max: 42.18%
Q3: 31.87%
Median: 17.80%
Q1: 9.28%
Min: -14.64%

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their ROE against their respective Food, Beverage & Tobacco and Household & Personal Products industry group benchmarks.

Net Margin (TTM)

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative net margin of -16.95%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Colgate-Palmolive (CL) reports 9.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

-16.95%

Max: 24.83%
Q3: 11.22%
Median: 5.94%
Q1: 2.05%
Min: -11.49%
CAG: -16.95%

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

9.65%

Max: 23.47%
Q3: 12.19%
CL: 9.65%
Median: 8.50%
Q1: 3.08%
Min: -9.74%

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their net margin against their respective Food, Beverage & Tobacco and Household & Personal Products industry group benchmarks.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 20.38% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Conagra Brands (CAG) at 11.59%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

11.59%

Max: 34.91%
Q3: 17.57%
CAG: 11.59%
Median: 11.06%
Q1: 4.15%
Min: -15.06%

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

20.38%

Max: 23.94%
CL: 20.38%
Q3: 17.03%
Median: 13.15%
Q1: 10.58%
Min: 1.87%

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their operating margin against their respective Food, Beverage & Tobacco and Household & Personal Products industry group benchmarks.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Metric	CAG	CL
ROE (TTM)	-24.89%	231.74%
ROA (TTM)	4.05%	16.05%
Net Margin (TTM)	-16.95%	9.65%
Operating Margin (TTM)	11.59%	20.38%
Gross Margin (TTM)	23.84%	60.64%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 1.40% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at -2.85% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Neither side shows strong earnings momentum: Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at -25.07% sits in the bottom EPS growth quartile, and Conagra Brands (CAG) at -266.67% is weaker still, below its industry range.

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Metric	CAG	CL
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-2.85%	1.40%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-2.78%	4.29%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-266.67%	-25.07%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	7.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.10 and Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 0.96 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

1.10

Max: 4.01
Q3: 2.35
Median: 1.53
CAG: 1.10
Q1: 1.02
Min: 0.33

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.96

Max: 4.26
Q3: 2.82
Median: 1.84
CL: 0.96
Q1: 0.92
Min: 0.65

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their current ratio against their respective Food, Beverage & Tobacco and Household & Personal Products industry group benchmarks.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but CL is more stretched: Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.21 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 12.06 is above its industry benchmark range.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

1.21

Max: 2.19
CAG: 1.21
Q3: 1.11
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.33
Min: 0.00

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

12.06

CL: 12.06
Max: 2.30
Q3: 2.12
Median: 0.81
Q1: 0.50
Min: 0.01

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against their respective Food, Beverage & Tobacco and Household & Personal Products industry group benchmarks.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Metric	CAG	CL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.10	0.96
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.21	12.06
Net Debt / EBITDA	4.46	1.21

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 7.90% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 2.13% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CAG the richer one.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

7.90%

Max: 9.38%
CAG: 7.90%
Q3: 3.77%
Median: 1.76%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.13%

Max: 5.00%
Q3: 2.47%
CL: 2.13%
Median: 1.30%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their dividend yield against their respective Food, Beverage & Tobacco and Household & Personal Products industry group benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 79.55% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 81.71% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

79.55%

Max: 199.19%
Q3: 81.03%
CAG: 79.55%
Median: 41.52%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

81.71%

Max: 140.00%
CL: 81.71%
Q3: 73.75%
Median: 46.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their payout ratio against their respective Food, Beverage & Tobacco and Household & Personal Products industry group benchmarks.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Metric	CAG	CL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	7.90%	2.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	79.55%	81.71%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Colgate-Palmolive (CL) trades at 37.57 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Conagra Brands (CAG) has no P/E ratio this period.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

Max: 52.52
Q3: 30.78
Median: 18.76
Q1: 12.77
Min: 4.72
CAG: --

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

37.57

CL: 37.57
Max: 37.57
Q3: 33.54
Median: 20.03
Q1: 15.76
Min: 6.45

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): CAG does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; CL is benchmarked against the Household & Personal Products industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 0.65 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 3.61 sits in the pricier quartile — CL costs more per dollar of sales.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.65

Max: 4.64
Q3: 2.27
Median: 1.17
CAG: 0.65
Q1: 0.52
Min: 0.00

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

3.61

Max: 4.36
CL: 3.61
Q3: 3.57
Median: 1.68
Q1: 0.76
Min: 0.30

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their P/S ratio against their respective Food, Beverage & Tobacco and Household & Personal Products industry group benchmarks.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.14 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 266.74 prices above its benchmark range — CL looks rich relative to book.

CAG

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

1.14

Max: 6.35
Q3: 3.07
Median: 1.58
CAG: 1.14
Q1: 0.82
Min: 0.00

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

266.74

CL: 266.74
Max: 12.30
Q3: 7.43
Median: 3.44
Q1: 1.30
Min: -3.91

Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL): A comparison of their P/B ratio against their respective Food, Beverage & Tobacco and Household & Personal Products industry group benchmarks.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Conagra Brands (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Metric	CAG	CL
P/E Ratio (TTM)	--	37.57
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.65	3.61
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1.14	266.74
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	5.77%	4.40%