C vs. GS: Citigroup vs. Goldman Sachs Stock Comparison
How do Citigroup (C) and Goldman Sachs (GS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Citigroup (C) and Goldman Sachs (GS) share the Financials sector but sit in different industry groups — C in Banks and GS in Financial Services.
| Profile Item | C | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Citigroup Inc. | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Banks | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Banks | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Banks | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 197.05 billion USD | 249.73 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 3, 1977 | May 4, 1999 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | C | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 23.42% | 17.85% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 47.29% | 44.69% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.24% | 20.41% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | C | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.96% | 33.28% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.17 | 1.27 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -40.60% | -30.90% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 9.35M | 2.10M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | C | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.64 | 0.41 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.90 | 0.59 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Citigroup (C) at 9.35% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.
C
Banks industry group
9.35%
- Max
- 19.84%
- Q3
- 13.67%
- Median
- 11.49%
- Q1
- 9.50%
- C
- 9.35%
- Min
- 3.64%
GS
Financial Services industry group
17.71%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- GS
- 17.71%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Citigroup (C) at 23.21% keeps a bottom-quartile share.
C
Banks industry group
23.21%
- Max
- 47.19%
- Q3
- 35.25%
- Median
- 31.21%
- Q1
- 27.11%
- C
- 23.21%
- Min
- 14.93%
GS
Financial Services industry group
31.21%
- Max
- 62.84%
- GS
- 31.21%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) reports operating margin of 38.37%; Citigroup (C) doesn’t report a comparable line — in Banks, funding costs sit inside the core business rather than below an operating line, so profitability is better judged on net margin or ROE.
C
Banks industry group
--
- C
- --
- Max
- --
- Q3
- --
- Median
- --
- Q1
- --
- Min
- --
GS
Financial Services industry group
38.37%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- GS
- 38.37%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | C | GS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 9.35% | 17.71% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.71% | 1.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 23.21% | 31.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | 38.37% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Citigroup (C) at 5.63% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Citigroup (C) at 17.68% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | C | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.63% | 8.92% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.59% | 7.16% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 17.68% | 26.59% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.05% | 19.52% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Citigroup (C) in Banks and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Citigroup (C) in Banks and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | C | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Citigroup (C) at 2.09% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
C
Banks industry group
2.09%
- Max
- 5.79%
- Q3
- 3.18%
- Median
- 2.39%
- C
- 2.09%
- Q1
- 1.20%
- Min
- 0.00%
GS
Financial Services industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- GS
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Citigroup (C) at 24.07% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 25.88% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
C
Banks industry group
24.07%
- Max
- 70.75%
- Q3
- 41.28%
- Median
- 29.26%
- C
- 24.07%
- Q1
- 18.98%
- Min
- 0.00%
GS
Financial Services industry group
25.88%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- GS
- 25.88%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | C | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 2.07% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 24.07% | 25.88% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Citigroup (C) at 11.60 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
C
Banks industry group
11.60
- Max
- 18.16
- Q3
- 13.75
- Median
- 11.81
- C
- 11.60
- Q1
- 10.64
- Min
- 6.49
GS
Financial Services industry group
12.45
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- GS
- 12.45
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) shows P/S ratio of 3.52; for Citigroup (C) the multiple is skipped — in Banks, income is dominated by interest spread rather than a conventional revenue line, so pricing per dollar of sales loses meaning and book- or earnings-based multiples carry the comparison.
C
Banks industry group
--
- C
- --
- Max
- --
- Q3
- --
- Median
- --
- Q1
- --
- Min
- --
GS
Financial Services industry group
3.52
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- GS
- 3.52
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Citigroup (C) at 1.03 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 is valued near its industry’s middle — C is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
C
Banks industry group
1.03
- Max
- 2.28
- Q3
- 1.58
- Median
- 1.32
- Q1
- 1.10
- C
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.59
GS
Financial Services industry group
2.36
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- GS
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | C | GS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 11.60 | 12.45 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | -- | 3.52 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.03 | 2.36 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |