Seek Returns

BTI vs. MNST: British American Tobacco vs. Monster Beverage Stock Comparison

How do British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but BTI is classified in Tobacco while MNST is classified in Beverages.

Monster Beverage (MNST) trades as ordinary local shares, while British American Tobacco (BTI) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
Profile ItemBTIMNST
NameBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. ADRMonster Beverage Corporation
Country/RegionUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS Industry GroupFood, Beverage & TobaccoFood, Beverage & Tobacco
GICS IndustryTobaccoBeverages
GICS Sub-IndustryTobaccoSoft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages
Market Capitalization132.52 billion USD92.38 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateApril 14, 1980December 9, 1985
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BTI
MNST
GSPC
Loading price history…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBTIMNST
Total Return (1Y)25.39%58.94%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)31.11%17.59%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)18.84%15.14%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BTI
MNST
GSPC
Loading price history…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBTIMNST
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)24.22%26.42%
Beta (5Y)0.310.53
Max Drawdown (5Y)-29.84%-26.62%
Avg. Volume (3M)4.19M5.72M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
BTI and MNST are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBTIMNST
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.882.08
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.363.60

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 26.65% sits in the top ROE quartile, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at 15.82% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MNST.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

15.82%

Max
34.02%
Q3
18.27%
BTI
15.82%
Median
14.93%
Q1
3.98%
Min
-12.58%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

26.65%

Max
34.02%
MNST
26.65%
Q3
18.27%
Median
14.93%
Q1
3.98%
Min
-12.58%
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their ROE against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

British American Tobacco (BTI) at 30.32% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 23.11% also retains a top-quartile share.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

30.32%

BTI
30.32%
Max
27.80%
Q3
12.49%
Median
6.11%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-14.28%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

23.11%

Max
27.80%
MNST
23.11%
Q3
12.49%
Median
6.11%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-14.28%
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their net margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both British American Tobacco (BTI) at 34.58% and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 31.02% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

34.58%

Max
36.04%
BTI
34.58%
Q3
17.42%
Median
10.90%
Q1
3.74%
Min
-7.33%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

31.02%

Max
36.04%
MNST
31.02%
Q3
17.42%
Median
10.90%
Q1
3.74%
Min
-7.33%
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their operating margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBTIMNST
ROE (TTM)15.82%26.65%
ROA (TTM)5.34%17.73%
Net Margin (TTM)30.32%23.11%
Operating Margin (TTM)34.58%31.02%
Gross Margin (TTM)82.65%55.47%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 10.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at -0.99% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but British American Tobacco (BTI) at 156.69% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; Monster Beverage (MNST) at 19.75% also sits in the top quartile.

Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBTIMNST
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.99%10.70%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-2.53%9.54%
EPS Growth (YoY)156.69%19.75%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)6.15%20.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 3.26 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at 0.87 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.87

Max
4.39
Q3
2.41
Median
1.60
Q1
1.02
BTI
0.87
Min
0.54

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.26

Max
4.39
MNST
3.26
Q3
2.41
Median
1.60
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their current ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at 0.73 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.73

Max
2.20
Q3
1.15
BTI
0.73
Median
0.67
Q1
0.34
Min
0.00

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.01

Max
2.20
Q3
1.15
Median
0.67
Q1
0.34
MNST
0.01
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBTIMNST
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.873.26
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.730.01
Net Debt / EBITDA2.66-1.02

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile British American Tobacco (BTI) reports a yield of 3.92%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.92%

Max
9.56%
Q3
4.15%
BTI
3.92%
Median
2.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
9.56%
Q3
4.15%
Median
2.57%
MNST
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile British American Tobacco (BTI) reports a payout of 68.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

68.73%

Max
159.06%
Q3
85.24%
BTI
68.73%
Median
44.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
159.06%
Q3
85.24%
Median
44.62%
MNST
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBTIMNST
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.92%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)68.73%0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

British American Tobacco (BTI) at 13.56 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 45.63 sits in the richer quartile — MNST needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

13.56

Max
53.44
Q3
29.84
Median
18.36
BTI
13.56
Q1
13.03
Min
5.50

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

45.63

Max
53.44
MNST
45.63
Q3
29.84
Median
18.36
Q1
13.03
Min
5.50
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both British American Tobacco (BTI) at 5.17 and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 10.51 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

5.17

BTI
5.17
Max
4.15
Q3
2.38
Median
1.04
Q1
0.57
Min
0.00

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

10.51

MNST
10.51
Max
4.15
Q3
2.38
Median
1.04
Q1
0.57
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both British American Tobacco (BTI) at 10.78 and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 10.58 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

BTI

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

10.78

BTI
10.78
Max
5.75
Q3
3.46
Median
1.75
Q1
0.99
Min
0.00

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

10.58

MNST
10.58
Max
5.75
Q3
3.46
Median
1.75
Q1
0.99
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
British American Tobacco (BTI) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for British American Tobacco (BTI) and Monster Beverage (MNST)
MetricBTIMNST
P/E Ratio (TTM)13.5645.63
P/S Ratio (TTM)5.1710.51
P/B Ratio (MRQ)10.7810.58
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.26%1.82%