BTI vs. PM: British American Tobacco vs. Philip Morris Stock Comparison

Company Profile

British American Tobacco (BTI) and Philip Morris (PM) are both classified in the Tobacco sub-industry within the broader Tobacco industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Philip Morris (PM) trades as ordinary local shares, while British American Tobacco (BTI) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: British American Tobacco (BTI) earns 13.42% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Philip Morris (PM) has no ROE this period.

For every dollar of sales, both British American Tobacco (BTI) at 24.99% and Philip Morris (PM) at 25.56% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

Philip Morris (PM) at 40.00% shows unusually strong operating efficiency — above its industry’s operating margin range — and British American Tobacco (BTI) at 34.91% also operates in the top quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Philip Morris (PM) at 7.31% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at -0.99% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but British American Tobacco (BTI) at 156.69% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; Philip Morris (PM) at 60.26% also sits in the top quartile.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both British American Tobacco (BTI) at 0.84 and Philip Morris (PM) at 0.98 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: British American Tobacco (BTI) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.72 against its industry range, while Philip Morris (PM) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

British American Tobacco (BTI) at 4.27% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Philip Morris (PM) at 3.11% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BTI the richer one.

Philip Morris (PM) at 80.73% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at 84.64% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both British American Tobacco (BTI) at 14.52 and Philip Morris (PM) at 26.12 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Both look expensive on sales: British American Tobacco (BTI) at 4.77 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Philip Morris (PM) at 6.97 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Philip Morris (PM) reports a negative P/B ratio of -34.57, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile British American Tobacco (BTI) reports 9.85, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics