MNST vs. PM: Monster Beverage vs. Philip Morris Stock Comparison

June 13, 2026

This page compares Monster Beverage (MNST) with Philip Morris (PM) using performance and risk, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividends, and valuation metrics.

Performance

Cumulative Growth

MNST

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Performance at a Glance

Performance metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Metric	MNST	PM
1-Year Return	45.75%	3.66%

Risk

Drawdown

MNST

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Risk at a Glance

Risk metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Metric	MNST	PM
1-Year Volatility	26.43%	27.78%
Beta	0.53	0.38
3-Month Avg. Volume	5.25M	4.73M

Company Profile

Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but MNST is classified in Beverages while PM is classified in Tobacco.

Company profile comparison for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Profile Item	MNST	PM
Name	Monster Beverage Corporation	Philip Morris International Inc.
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Staples	Consumer Staples
GICS Industry Group	Food, Beverage & Tobacco	Food, Beverage & Tobacco
GICS Industry	Beverages	Tobacco
GICS Sub-Industry	Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages	Tobacco
Market Capitalization	90.79 billion USD	287.24 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	December 9, 1985	March 17, 2008
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

Philip Morris (PM) at 25.96 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 44.85 sits in the richer quartile — MNST needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

44.85

Max: 45.22
MNST: 44.85
Q3: 29.15
Median: 18.76
Q1: 11.63
Min: 5.43

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

25.96

Max: 45.22
Q3: 29.15
PM: 25.96
Median: 18.76
Q1: 11.63
Min: 5.43

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both Monster Beverage (MNST) at 10.32 and Philip Morris (PM) at 6.92 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

10.32

MNST: 10.32
Max: 3.97
Q3: 2.30
Median: 1.00
Q1: 0.57
Min: 0.00

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

6.92

PM: 6.92
Max: 3.97
Q3: 2.30
Median: 1.00
Q1: 0.57
Min: 0.00

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

Philip Morris (PM) reports a negative P/B ratio of -30.95, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Monster Beverage (MNST) reports 10.40, ranking against industry peers normally.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

10.40

MNST: 10.40
Max: 5.99
Q3: 3.21
Median: 1.70
Q1: 0.96
Min: 0.00

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

-30.95

Max: 5.99
Q3: 3.21
Median: 1.70
Q1: 0.96
Min: 0.00
PM: -30.95

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Valuation metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Metric	MNST	PM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	44.85	25.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	10.32	6.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	10.40	-30.95
Free Cash Flow Yield	1.86%	2.99%

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Monster Beverage (MNST) earns 26.65% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Philip Morris (PM) has no ROE this period.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

26.65%

Max: 37.95%
MNST: 26.65%
Q3: 18.99%
Median: 14.93%
Q1: 3.88%
Min: -18.08%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

Max: 37.95%
Q3: 18.99%
Median: 14.93%
Q1: 3.88%
Min: -18.08%
PM: --

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): PM does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; MNST is benchmarked against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Monster Beverage (MNST) at 23.11% and Philip Morris (PM) at 26.74% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

23.11%

Max: 27.80%
MNST: 23.11%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 6.11%
Q1: 1.28%
Min: -7.46%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

26.74%

Max: 27.80%
PM: 26.74%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 6.11%
Q1: 1.28%
Min: -7.46%

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their net margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Both Monster Beverage (MNST) at 31.02% and Philip Morris (PM) at 36.04% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

31.02%

Max: 36.04%
MNST: 31.02%
Q3: 17.34%
Median: 10.44%
Q1: 3.65%
Min: -7.33%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

36.04%

PM: 36.04%
Max: 36.04%
Q3: 17.34%
Median: 10.44%
Q1: 3.65%
Min: -7.33%

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Profitability metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Metric	MNST	PM
Return on Equity (TTM)	26.65%	--
Return on Assets (TTM)	17.73%	15.46%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	23.11%	26.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	31.02%	36.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	55.47%	67.28%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

Revenue growth metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Metric	MNST	PM
1-Year Revenue Growth	10.70%	7.31%
3-Year Revenue CAGR	9.54%	8.57%

EPS Growth

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

EPS growth metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Metric	MNST	PM
1-Year EPS Growth	19.75%	60.26%
3-Year EPS CAGR	20.28%	7.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 3.26 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Philip Morris (PM) at 0.98 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.26

Max: 5.06
MNST: 3.26
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.54

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.98

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.05
PM: 0.98
Min: 0.54

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Monster Beverage (MNST) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 against its industry range, while Philip Morris (PM) reports no figure this period.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.01

Max: 2.20
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.70
Q1: 0.35
MNST: 0.01
Min: 0.00

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

Max: 2.20
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.70
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00
PM: --

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): PM does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; MNST is benchmarked against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Financial strength metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Metric	MNST	PM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.26	0.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.01	--
Net Debt / EBITDA	-1.02	2.50

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Philip Morris (PM) reports a yield of 3.19%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max: 10.71%
Q3: 4.63%
Median: 3.19%
MNST: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.19%

Max: 10.71%
Q3: 4.63%
PM: 3.19%
Median: 3.19%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Philip Morris (PM) reports a payout of 81.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max: 159.06%
Q3: 86.47%
Median: 45.18%
MNST: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

81.09%

Max: 159.06%
Q3: 86.47%
PM: 81.09%
Median: 45.18%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividends at a Glance

Dividend metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Metric	MNST	PM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	3.19%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	81.09%