Seek Returns

MNST vs. PM: Monster Beverage vs. Philip Morris Stock Comparison

How do Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but MNST is classified in Beverages while PM is classified in Tobacco.

Company profile comparison for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
Profile ItemMNSTPM
NameMonster Beverage CorporationPhilip Morris International Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS Industry GroupFood, Beverage & TobaccoFood, Beverage & Tobacco
GICS IndustryBeveragesTobacco
GICS Sub-IndustrySoft Drinks & Non-alcoholic BeveragesTobacco
Market Capitalization85.85 billion USD284.49 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateDecember 9, 1985March 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MNST
PM
GSPC
Loading price history…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
MetricMNSTPM
Total Return (1Y)38.12%17.37%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)15.72%29.45%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)12.43%16.79%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MNST
PM
GSPC
Loading price history…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
MetricMNSTPM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)26.59%28.05%
Beta (5Y)0.480.34
Max Drawdown (5Y)-26.03%-22.78%
Avg. Volume (3M)11.24M4.90M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
MNST and PM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
MetricMNSTPM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.280.47
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.110.69

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Monster Beverage (MNST) earns 25.70% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Philip Morris (PM) has no ROE this period.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

25.70%

Max
34.02%
MNST
25.70%
Q3
17.19%
Median
10.87%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-16.01%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

--

Max
34.02%
Q3
17.19%
Median
10.87%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-16.01%
PM
--
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): PM does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; MNST is benchmarked against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Monster Beverage (MNST) at 23.08% and Philip Morris (PM) at 25.56% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

23.08%

Max
25.56%
MNST
23.08%
Q3
11.22%
Median
4.88%
Q1
1.19%
Min
-13.81%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

25.56%

PM
25.56%
Max
25.56%
Q3
11.22%
Median
4.88%
Q1
1.19%
Min
-13.81%
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their net margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Philip Morris (PM) at 40.00% shows unusually strong operating efficiency — above its industry’s operating margin range — and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 29.18% also operates in the top quartile.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

29.18%

Max
35.93%
MNST
29.18%
Q3
17.10%
Median
11.06%
Q1
3.99%
Min
-11.04%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

40.00%

PM
40.00%
Max
35.93%
Q3
17.10%
Median
11.06%
Q1
3.99%
Min
-11.04%
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
MetricMNSTPM
ROE (TTM)25.70%--
ROA (TTM)17.48%14.59%
Net Margin (TTM)23.08%25.56%
Operating Margin (TTM)29.18%40.00%
Gross Margin (TTM)55.55%67.48%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 10.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Philip Morris (PM) at 7.31% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for MNST.

Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Philip Morris (PM) at 60.26% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 19.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PM.

Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
MetricMNSTPM
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.70%7.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.54%8.57%
EPS Growth (YoY)19.75%60.26%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)20.28%7.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 3.73 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Philip Morris (PM) at 0.98 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.73

Max
4.39
MNST
3.73
Q3
2.48
Median
1.53
Q1
1.00
Min
0.43

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.98

Max
4.39
Q3
2.48
Median
1.53
Q1
1.00
PM
0.98
Min
0.43
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Monster Beverage (MNST) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 against its industry range, while Philip Morris (PM) reports no figure this period.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.01

Max
2.21
Q3
1.13
Median
0.71
Q1
0.31
MNST
0.01
Min
0.00

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

--

Max
2.21
Q3
1.13
Median
0.71
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00
PM
--
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): PM does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; MNST is benchmarked against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
MetricMNSTPM
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.730.98
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.01--
Net Debt / EBITDA-1.132.39

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Philip Morris (PM) reports a yield of 3.16%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
8.96%
Q3
3.75%
Median
2.35%
MNST
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.16%

Max
8.96%
Q3
3.75%
PM
3.16%
Median
2.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Philip Morris (PM) reports a payout of 80.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max
188.31%
Q3
81.68%
Median
46.29%
MNST
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

80.73%

Max
188.31%
Q3
81.68%
PM
80.73%
Median
46.29%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
MetricMNSTPM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%80.73%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Philip Morris (PM) at 25.07 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 40.57 sits in the richer quartile — MNST needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

40.57

Max
45.24
MNST
40.57
Q3
30.64
Median
18.56
Q1
14.03
Min
2.48

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

25.07

Max
45.24
Q3
30.64
PM
25.07
Median
18.56
Q1
14.03
Min
2.48
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both Monster Beverage (MNST) at 9.31 and Philip Morris (PM) at 6.69 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.31

MNST
9.31
Max
4.63
Q3
2.26
Median
1.03
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

6.69

PM
6.69
Max
4.63
Q3
2.26
Median
1.03
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Philip Morris (PM) reports a negative P/B ratio of -33.15, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Monster Beverage (MNST) reports 9.17, ranking against industry peers normally.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.17

MNST
9.17
Max
4.89
Q3
3.16
Median
1.77
Q1
0.99
Min
0.00

PM

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

-33.15

Max
4.89
Q3
3.16
Median
1.77
Q1
0.99
Min
0.00
PM
-33.15
Loading chart…
Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris (PM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Philip Morris (PM)
MetricMNSTPM
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.5725.07
P/S Ratio (TTM)9.316.69
P/B Ratio (MRQ)9.17-33.15
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)1.96%3.41%