Seek Returns logo

MNST vs. PM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MNST and PM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMNSTPM
Company NameMonster Beverage CorporationPhilip Morris International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesTobacco
Market Capitalization60.83 billion USD260.53 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 9, 1985March 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MNST and PM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MNST vs. PM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMNSTPM
5-Day Price Return-2.64%-0.83%
13-Week Price Return-0.91%-4.49%
26-Week Price Return20.53%11.73%
52-Week Price Return34.04%39.36%
Month-to-Date Return6.04%2.02%
Year-to-Date Return18.53%39.07%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.08M4.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.79M5.75M
3-Month Volatility23.21%25.91%
Beta0.530.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MNST

24.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

MNST’s Return on Equity of 24.73% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PM

575.44%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
7.92%
Q1
5.28%
Min
4.04%

PM’s Return on Equity of 575.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MNST

20.54%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.54% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PM

21.08%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.05%
Q1
6.80%
Min
5.37%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.08% places PM in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MNST

26.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PM

36.28%

Tobacco Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
12.68%
Median
11.00%
Q1
10.58%
Min
10.58%

PM’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMNSTPM
Return on Equity (TTM)24.73%575.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.23%12.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.54%21.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.93%36.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.18%66.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

3.52

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Beverages industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PM

0.83

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.20
Q3
1.83
Median
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.57

PM’s Current Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the median group of the Tobacco industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PM

186.08

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.74
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 186.08, PM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PM

11.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
36.48
Q3
28.54
Median
7.02
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

PM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Tobacco industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMNSTPM
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.520.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.860.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.00186.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)123.8111.67

Growth

Revenue Growth

MNST vs. PM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MNST vs. PM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PM

3.10%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
6.06%
Median
5.48%
Q1
3.91%
Min
3.27%

PM’s Dividend Yield of 3.10% is below the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PM

70.92%

Tobacco Industry

Max
77.64%
Q3
76.55%
Median
50.14%
Q1
47.08%
Min
42.39%

PM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.92% is within the typical range for the Tobacco industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMNSTPM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%70.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MNST

40.32

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 40.32 places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PM

32.70

Tobacco Industry

Max
42.16
Q3
36.45
Median
20.93
Q1
10.52
Min
9.15

PM’s P/E Ratio of 32.70 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MNST

8.28

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 8.28, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PM

6.89

Tobacco Industry

Max
10.48
Q3
5.39
Median
3.32
Q1
1.54
Min
0.59

PM’s P/S Ratio of 6.89 is in the upper echelon for the Tobacco industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PM

1,368.86

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
2.18
Q1
1.70
Min
1.06

At 1,368.86, PM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MNST vs. PM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMNSTPM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.3232.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.286.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.491,368.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.2027.63