BTI vs. CAG: British American Tobacco vs. Conagra Brands Stock Comparison

Company Profile

British American Tobacco (BTI) and Conagra Brands (CAG) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but BTI is classified in Tobacco while CAG is classified in Food Products.

Conagra Brands (CAG) trades as ordinary local shares, while British American Tobacco (BTI) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative beta of -0.00, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. British American Tobacco (BTI) has a non-negative beta of 0.29.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative ROE of -24.89%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile British American Tobacco (BTI) reports 13.42%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative net margin of -16.95%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile British American Tobacco (BTI) reports 24.99%, ranking against industry peers normally.

British American Tobacco (BTI) at 34.91% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Conagra Brands (CAG) at 11.59%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

British American Tobacco (BTI) at -0.99% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at -2.85% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

British American Tobacco (BTI) at 156.69% sits above its peer range for EPS growth; Conagra Brands (CAG) at -266.67% sits below its range, putting their earnings trajectories at opposite ends.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at 0.84 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for BTI.

British American Tobacco (BTI) at 0.72 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.21 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both British American Tobacco (BTI) at 3.88% and Conagra Brands (CAG) at 7.90% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 79.55% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at 83.97% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: British American Tobacco (BTI) trades at 15.61 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Conagra Brands (CAG) has no P/E ratio this period.

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 0.65 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at 5.08 clears its benchmark range — BTI looks notably rich on sales.

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.14 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while British American Tobacco (BTI) at 10.59 prices above its benchmark range — BTI looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics