BSAC vs. WFC: Banco Santander-Chile vs. Wells Fargo Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) and Wells Fargo (WFC) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Wells Fargo (WFC) trades as ordinary local shares, while Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Wells Fargo (WFC) is heavily traded at around 14.10M shares per day, whereas Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) sees a more moderate 364.16K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 23.31% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Wells Fargo (WFC) at 12.91%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 47.19% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Wells Fargo (WFC) at 27.64%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) in Banks and Wells Fargo (WFC) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 9.86% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Wells Fargo (WFC) at 1.70% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 22.86% and Wells Fargo (WFC) at 16.57% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) in Banks and Wells Fargo (WFC) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) in Banks and Wells Fargo (WFC) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Wells Fargo (WFC) reports a yield of 2.19%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Wells Fargo (WFC) at 26.09% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 57.73% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 12.48 and Wells Fargo (WFC) at 11.84 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) in Banks and Wells Fargo (WFC) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) at 1.33 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Wells Fargo (WFC) at 1.59 carries an above-peer premium to book — WFC is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics