BNT vs. WTW: Brookfield Wealth vs. Willis Towers Watson Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) both belong to the Insurance industry, though BNT is classified under Life & Health Insurance while WTW falls under Insurance Brokers.

Willis Towers Watson (WTW) has more than two decades of public-market history since June 12, 2001, whereas Brookfield Wealth (BNT) listed on June 28, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) has an aggressive beta of 1.57, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) is defensive at 0.42 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 20.18% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 1.05% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 15.22% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 1.06% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at -20.37% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at -2.24% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Only one side can be read here: Brookfield Wealth (BNT) reports EPS growth of -53.90%, ranked against its industry; Willis Towers Watson (WTW) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.62% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 0.29% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 30.95% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 23.34% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 20.20 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 49.19 is richer still, above its industry range.

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.96 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 2.95 sits in the pricier quartile — WTW costs more per dollar of sales.

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.84 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 3.91 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics