BNS vs. MUFG: Bank of Nova Scotia vs. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) at 11.46% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 9.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Both Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) at 28.43% and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 27.45% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) at 10.36% and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 9.98% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 33.15% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) at -3.41% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) at 4.84% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 406.81% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 34.74% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) at 58.04% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 13.71 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) at 16.61 sits in the richer quartile — BNS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Both Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) at 1.76 and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 1.64 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics