BHP vs. CF: BHP vs. CF Industries Stock Comparison
How do BHP (BHP) and CF Industries (CF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
BHP (BHP) and CF Industries (CF) both fall under the Materials industry group, but BHP is classified in Metals & Mining while CF is classified in Chemicals.
CF Industries (CF) trades as ordinary local shares, while BHP (BHP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| Name | BHP Group Ltd. Sponsored ADR | CF Industries Holdings, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Australia | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Metals & Mining | Fertilizers & Agricultural Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 203.04 billion USD | 17.46 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | August 11, 2005 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 55.75% | 49.36% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.27% | 17.00% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.05% | 16.09% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.60% | 43.66% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.56 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.21% | -48.36% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.84M | 2.49M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.49 | 1.03 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.22 | 1.59 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both BHP (BHP) at 24.00% and CF Industries (CF) at 30.86% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
BHP
Materials industry group
24.00%
- Max
- 52.88%
- BHP
- 24.00%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
CF
Materials industry group
30.86%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CF
- 30.86%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both BHP (BHP) at 16.73% and CF Industries (CF) at 27.48% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
BHP
Materials industry group
16.73%
- Max
- 38.66%
- BHP
- 16.73%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
CF
Materials industry group
27.48%
- Max
- 38.66%
- CF
- 27.48%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both BHP (BHP) at 43.34% and CF Industries (CF) at 34.36% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
BHP
Materials industry group
43.34%
- Max
- 66.70%
- BHP
- 43.34%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
CF
Materials industry group
34.36%
- Max
- 66.70%
- CF
- 34.36%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 24.00% | 30.86% |
| ROA (TTM) | 13.43% | 12.61% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.73% | 27.48% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 43.34% | 34.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 85.92% | 42.52% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both BHP (BHP) at 14.63% and CF Industries (CF) at 19.34% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both BHP (BHP) at 8.91% and CF Industries (CF) at 33.09% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 14.63% | 19.34% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.97% | -14.12% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.91% | 33.09% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.80% | -18.19% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both BHP (BHP) at 1.89 and CF Industries (CF) at 2.98 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
BHP
Materials industry group
1.89
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- BHP
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
CF
Materials industry group
2.98
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- CF
- 2.98
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both BHP (BHP) at 0.50 and CF Industries (CF) at 0.41 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BHP
Materials industry group
0.50
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- BHP
- 0.50
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
CF
Materials industry group
0.41
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- CF
- 0.41
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.89 | 2.98 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.50 | 0.41 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.33 | 0.21 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 2.19% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while CF Industries (CF) at 1.77% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BHP the richer one.
BHP
Materials industry group
2.19%
- Max
- 4.52%
- BHP
- 2.19%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CF
Materials industry group
1.77%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- CF
- 1.77%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
CF Industries (CF) at 14.81% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while BHP (BHP) at 68.84% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
BHP
Materials industry group
68.84%
- Max
- 83.62%
- BHP
- 68.84%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CF
Materials industry group
14.81%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- CF
- 14.81%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.19% | 1.77% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 68.84% | 14.81% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
CF Industries (CF) at 8.42 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while BHP (BHP) at 20.70 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for CF, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
BHP
Materials industry group
20.70
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- BHP
- 20.70
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
CF
Materials industry group
8.42
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- CF
- 8.42
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both BHP (BHP) at 3.46 and CF Industries (CF) at 2.20 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
BHP
Materials industry group
3.46
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- BHP
- 3.46
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
CF
Materials industry group
2.20
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- CF
- 2.20
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
CF Industries (CF) at 3.10 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while BHP (BHP) at 3.98 carries an above-peer premium to book — BHP is pricier on assets.
BHP
Materials industry group
3.98
- Max
- 6.59
- BHP
- 3.98
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
CF
Materials industry group
3.10
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- CF
- 3.10
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 20.70 | 8.42 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.46 | 2.20 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.98 | 3.10 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.72% | 9.10% |