BCS vs. MUFG: Barclays vs. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Barclays (BCS) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Both Barclays (BCS) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Barclays (BCS) at 10.45% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 9.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Both Barclays (BCS) at 28.22% and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 27.45% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Barclays (BCS) at 11.09% and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 9.98% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 33.15% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Barclays (BCS) at 21.55% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for MUFG.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 406.81% yields beyond its industry’s entire range — a level that invites a dividend-safety check — while Barclays (BCS) at 0.50% sits in the bottom quartile of its peers.

Both Barclays (BCS) at 22.96% and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 34.74% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Barclays (BCS) at 8.33 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 13.71 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for BCS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Barclays (BCS) in Banks and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Barclays (BCS) at 0.88 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial (MUFG) at 1.64 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics