BBD vs. CM: Banco Bradesco vs. Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Banco Bradesco (BBD) and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Banco Bradesco (BBD) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 14.20% and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.58% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Both Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 27.27% and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 33.74% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 11.85% and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 13.66% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 37.42% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 17.72% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for BBD.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 3.62% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 53.03% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 40.12% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 53.52% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 5.64 trades below its industry P/E ratio range, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.32 sits in the richer quartile — the market is paying very different prices for each company’s trailing earnings.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 0.69 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 2.24 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics