BAP vs. KB: Credicorp vs. KB Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Credicorp (BAP) and KB Financial (KB) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Credicorp (BAP) trades as ordinary local shares, while KB Financial (KB) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Credicorp (BAP) earns 20.41% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; KB Financial (KB) has no ROE this period.

Credicorp (BAP) at 33.10% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while KB Financial (KB) at 17.25% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and KB Financial (KB) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Credicorp (BAP) at 11.57% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while KB Financial (KB) at 5.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Credicorp (BAP) at 26.04% and KB Financial (KB) at 27.83% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and KB Financial (KB) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and KB Financial (KB) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Credicorp (BAP) at 14.37% and KB Financial (KB) at 1,434.96% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

KB Financial (KB) at 26.89% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Credicorp (BAP) at 53.95% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

KB Financial (KB) at 9.55 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Credicorp (BAP) at 13.10 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for KB, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Credicorp (BAP) in Banks and KB Financial (KB) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Measured against book value, both Credicorp (BAP) at 2.57 and KB Financial (KB) at 3.68 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics