BAH vs. TRU: Booz Allen Hamilton vs. TransUnion Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU) are both classified in the Research & Consulting Services sub-industry within the broader Professional Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU)
Profile Item	BAH	TRU
Name	Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock	TransUnion
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Commercial & Professional Services	Commercial & Professional Services
GICS Industry	Professional Services	Professional Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Research & Consulting Services	Research & Consulting Services
Market Capitalization	10.16 billion USD	15.48 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 18, 2010	June 25, 2015
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BAH

TRU

GSPC

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU)
Metric	BAH	TRU
Total Return (1Y)	2.63%	3.77%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	-9.38%	16.74%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	1.84%	-5.77%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BAH

TRU

GSPC

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

TransUnion (TRU) has an aggressive beta of 1.52, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) is defensive at 0.29 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk profile metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU)
Metric	BAH	TRU
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	42.02%	42.86%
Beta (5Y)	0.29	1.52
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-66.59%	-63.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.79M	2.74M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

BAH and TRU are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU)
Metric	BAH	TRU
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.04	-0.01
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.06	-0.02

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 70.00% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than TransUnion (TRU) at 16.96%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

70.00%

BAH: 70.00%
Max: 47.06%
Q3: 25.43%
Median: 14.11%
Q1: 3.92%
Min: -20.15%

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

16.96%

Max: 47.06%
Q3: 25.43%
TRU: 16.96%
Median: 14.11%
Q1: 3.92%
Min: -20.15%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

TransUnion (TRU) at 15.83% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 7.14%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

7.14%

Max: 23.28%
Q3: 11.35%
BAH: 7.14%
Median: 5.65%
Q1: 0.87%
Min: -8.60%

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

15.83%

Max: 23.28%
TRU: 15.83%
Q3: 11.35%
Median: 5.65%
Q1: 0.87%
Min: -8.60%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

TransUnion (TRU) at 20.36% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.82%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.82%

Max: 38.50%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
BAH: 8.82%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

20.36%

Max: 38.50%
TRU: 20.36%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU)
Metric	BAH	TRU
ROE (TTM)	70.00%	16.96%
ROA (TTM)	8.48%	5.25%
Net Margin (TTM)	7.14%	15.83%
Operating Margin (TTM)	8.82%	20.36%
Gross Margin (TTM)	22.58%	58.82%

Growth

Revenue Growth

TransUnion (TRU) at 9.38% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at -6.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

TransUnion (TRU) at 60.00% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at -4.83% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for TRU.

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU)
Metric	BAH	TRU
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-6.37%	9.38%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	6.60%	7.25%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-4.83%	60.00%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	50.35%	18.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 1.44 and TransUnion (TRU) at 2.03 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.44

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
Median: 1.55
BAH: 1.44
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.45

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.03

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
TRU: 2.03
Median: 1.55
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.45

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

TransUnion (TRU) at 1.10 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 3.78 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.78

BAH: 3.78
Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.25
Median: 0.88
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.10

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.25
TRU: 1.10
Median: 0.88
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU)
Metric	BAH	TRU
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.44	2.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	3.78	1.10
Net Debt / EBITDA	3.56	2.90

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 2.60% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while TransUnion (TRU) at 0.62% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BAH the richer one.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.60%

Max: 4.33%
BAH: 2.60%
Q3: 1.80%
Median: 0.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.62%

Max: 4.33%
Q3: 1.80%
TRU: 0.62%
Median: 0.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 36.02% and TransUnion (TRU) at 11.92% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

36.02%

Max: 99.58%
Q3: 41.99%
BAH: 36.02%
Median: 17.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

11.92%

Max: 99.58%
Q3: 41.99%
Median: 17.27%
TRU: 11.92%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU)
Metric	BAH	TRU
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.60%	0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	36.02%	11.92%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 13.25 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while TransUnion (TRU) at 19.75 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for BAH, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

13.25

Max: 49.47
Q3: 33.76
Median: 24.16
Q1: 16.01
BAH: 13.25
Min: 1.89

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.75

Max: 49.47
Q3: 33.76
Median: 24.16
TRU: 19.75
Q1: 16.01
Min: 1.89

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 0.93 and TransUnion (TRU) at 3.07 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.93

Max: 7.17
Q3: 3.35
Median: 1.33
BAH: 0.93
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.07

Max: 7.17
Q3: 3.35
TRU: 3.07
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

TransUnion (TRU) at 3.19 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.17 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAH is pricier on assets.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.17

Max: 11.25
BAH: 8.17
Q3: 6.08
Median: 2.92
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.19

Max: 11.25
Q3: 6.08
TRU: 3.19
Median: 2.92
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. TransUnion (TRU): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and TransUnion (TRU)
Metric	BAH	TRU
P/E Ratio (TTM)	13.25	19.75
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.93	3.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	8.17	3.19
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	7.76%	5.91%