Seek Returns

TRU vs. WM: TransUnion vs. Waste Management Stock Comparison

How do TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM) both fall under the Commercial & Professional Services industry group, but TRU is classified in Professional Services while WM is classified in Commercial Services & Supplies.

Company profile comparison for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM)
Profile ItemTRUWM
NameTransUnionWaste Management Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCommercial & Professional ServicesCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesCommercial Services & Supplies
GICS Sub-IndustryResearch & Consulting ServicesEnvironmental & Facilities Services
Market Capitalization15.48 billion USD93.95 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 25, 2015June 22, 1988
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

TRU
WM
GSPC
Loading price history…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM)
MetricTRUWM
Total Return (1Y)3.77%19.43%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)16.74%13.45%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-5.77%9.97%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

TRU
WM
GSPC
Loading price history…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

TransUnion (TRU) has an aggressive beta of 1.52, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Waste Management (WM) is defensive at 0.37 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk profile metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM)
MetricTRUWM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.86%21.31%
Beta (5Y)1.520.37
Max Drawdown (5Y)-63.37%-18.14%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.74M2.24M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
TRU and WM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM)
MetricTRUWM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.010.71
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.021.07

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Waste Management (WM) at 31.68% sits in the top ROE quartile, while TransUnion (TRU) at 16.96% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for WM.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

16.96%

Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
TRU
16.96%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
Min
-20.15%

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

31.68%

Max
47.06%
WM
31.68%
Q3
25.43%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
Min
-20.15%
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both TransUnion (TRU) at 15.83% and Waste Management (WM) at 11.78% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

15.83%

Max
23.28%
TRU
15.83%
Q3
11.35%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
Min
-8.60%

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

11.78%

Max
23.28%
WM
11.78%
Q3
11.35%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
Min
-8.60%
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both TransUnion (TRU) at 20.36% and Waste Management (WM) at 19.08% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

20.36%

Max
38.50%
TRU
20.36%
Q3
18.84%
Median
10.40%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.08%

Max
38.50%
WM
19.08%
Q3
18.84%
Median
10.40%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM)
MetricTRUWM
ROE (TTM)16.96%31.68%
ROA (TTM)5.25%6.69%
Net Margin (TTM)15.83%11.78%
Operating Margin (TTM)20.36%19.08%
Gross Margin (TTM)58.82%40.39%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Waste Management (WM) at 14.24% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while TransUnion (TRU) at 9.38% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for WM.

Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

TransUnion (TRU) at 60.00% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Waste Management (WM) at -1.62% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for TRU.

Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM)
MetricTRUWM
Revenue Growth (YoY)9.38%14.24%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)7.25%8.56%
EPS Growth (YoY)60.00%-1.62%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)18.34%7.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TransUnion (TRU) at 2.03 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Waste Management (WM) at 0.82 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for WM.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.03

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
TRU
2.03
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
Min
0.45

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.82

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
WM
0.82
Min
0.45
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

TransUnion (TRU) at 1.10 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Waste Management (WM) at 2.37 uses more debt funding than most peers.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.10

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
TRU
1.10
Median
0.88
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.37

WM
2.37
Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
Median
0.88
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM)
MetricTRUWM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.030.82
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.102.37
Net Debt / EBITDA2.902.94

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both TransUnion (TRU) at 0.62% and Waste Management (WM) at 1.52% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.62%

Max
4.33%
Q3
1.80%
TRU
0.62%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.52%

Max
4.33%
Q3
1.80%
WM
1.52%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TransUnion (TRU) at 11.92% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Waste Management (WM) at 48.03% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

11.92%

Max
99.58%
Q3
41.99%
Median
17.27%
TRU
11.92%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

48.03%

Max
99.58%
WM
48.03%
Q3
41.99%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM)
MetricTRUWM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.62%1.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)11.92%48.03%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both TransUnion (TRU) at 19.75 and Waste Management (WM) at 31.01 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.75

Max
49.47
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
TRU
19.75
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

31.01

Max
49.47
Q3
33.76
WM
31.01
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

TransUnion (TRU) at 3.07 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Waste Management (WM) at 3.60 sits in the pricier quartile — WM costs more per dollar of sales.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.07

Max
7.17
Q3
3.35
TRU
3.07
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.60

Max
7.17
WM
3.60
Q3
3.35
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

TransUnion (TRU) at 3.19 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Waste Management (WM) at 9.52 carries an above-peer premium to book — WM is pricier on assets.

TRU

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.19

Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
TRU
3.19
Median
2.92
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78

WM

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

9.52

Max
11.25
WM
9.52
Q3
6.08
Median
2.92
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78
Loading chart…
TransUnion (TRU) vs. Waste Management (WM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Waste Management (WM)
MetricTRUWM
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.7531.01
P/S Ratio (TTM)3.073.60
P/B Ratio (MRQ)3.199.52
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)5.91%2.64%