BAH vs. CTAS: Booz Allen Hamilton vs. Cintas Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS) both fall under the Commercial & Professional Services industry group, but BAH is classified in Professional Services while CTAS is classified in Commercial Services & Supplies.

Company profile comparison for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS)
Profile Item	BAH	CTAS
Name	Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock	Cintas Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Commercial & Professional Services	Commercial & Professional Services
GICS Industry	Professional Services	Commercial Services & Supplies
GICS Sub-Industry	Research & Consulting Services	Diversified Support Services
Market Capitalization	10.16 billion USD	88.29 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	Nasdaq
Listing Date	November 18, 2010	August 19, 1983
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BAH

CTAS

GSPC

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS)
Metric	BAH	CTAS
Total Return (1Y)	2.63%	21.43%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	-9.38%	20.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	1.84%	16.37%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BAH

CTAS

GSPC

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS)
Metric	BAH	CTAS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	42.02%	23.96%
Beta (5Y)	0.29	0.85
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-66.59%	-27.68%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.79M	1.91M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

BAH and CTAS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS)
Metric	BAH	CTAS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.04	0.72
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.06	1.06

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both companies show strong equity returns, but Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 70.00% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Cintas (CTAS) at 41.38% also sits in the top quartile.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

70.00%

BAH: 70.00%
Max: 47.06%
Q3: 25.43%
Median: 14.11%
Q1: 3.92%
Min: -20.15%

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

41.38%

Max: 47.06%
CTAS: 41.38%
Q3: 25.43%
Median: 14.11%
Q1: 3.92%
Min: -20.15%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Cintas (CTAS) at 17.82% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 7.14%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

7.14%

Max: 23.28%
Q3: 11.35%
BAH: 7.14%
Median: 5.65%
Q1: 0.87%
Min: -8.60%

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

17.82%

Max: 23.28%
CTAS: 17.82%
Q3: 11.35%
Median: 5.65%
Q1: 0.87%
Min: -8.60%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Cintas (CTAS) at 24.10% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.82%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.82%

Max: 38.50%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
BAH: 8.82%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

24.10%

Max: 38.50%
CTAS: 24.10%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS)
Metric	BAH	CTAS
ROE (TTM)	70.00%	41.38%
ROA (TTM)	8.48%	16.66%
Net Margin (TTM)	7.14%	17.82%
Operating Margin (TTM)	8.82%	24.10%
Gross Margin (TTM)	22.58%	50.99%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Cintas (CTAS) at 8.94% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at -6.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at -4.83% and Cintas (CTAS) at 11.59% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS)
Metric	BAH	CTAS
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-6.37%	8.94%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	6.60%	8.51%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-4.83%	11.59%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	50.35%	14.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 1.44 and Cintas (CTAS) at 1.45 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.44

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
Median: 1.55
BAH: 1.44
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.45

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.45

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
Median: 1.55
CTAS: 1.45
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.45

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Cintas (CTAS) at 0.52 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 3.78 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.78

BAH: 3.78
Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.25
Median: 0.88
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.52

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.25
Median: 0.88
CTAS: 0.52
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS)
Metric	BAH	CTAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.44	1.45
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	3.78	0.52
Net Debt / EBITDA	3.56	0.76

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 2.60% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cintas (CTAS) at 0.83% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BAH the richer one.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.60%

Max: 4.33%
BAH: 2.60%
Q3: 1.80%
Median: 0.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.83%

Max: 4.33%
Q3: 1.80%
CTAS: 0.83%
Median: 0.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 36.02% and Cintas (CTAS) at 36.88% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

36.02%

Max: 99.58%
Q3: 41.99%
BAH: 36.02%
Median: 17.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

36.88%

Max: 99.58%
Q3: 41.99%
CTAS: 36.88%
Median: 17.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS)
Metric	BAH	CTAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.60%	0.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	36.02%	36.88%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 13.25 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cintas (CTAS) at 43.86 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

13.25

Max: 49.47
Q3: 33.76
Median: 24.16
Q1: 16.01
BAH: 13.25
Min: 1.89

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

43.86

Max: 49.47
CTAS: 43.86
Q3: 33.76
Median: 24.16
Q1: 16.01
Min: 1.89

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 0.93 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cintas (CTAS) at 7.64 clears its benchmark range — CTAS looks notably rich on sales.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.93

Max: 7.17
Q3: 3.35
Median: 1.33
BAH: 0.93
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

7.64

CTAS: 7.64
Max: 7.17
Q3: 3.35
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.17 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Cintas (CTAS) at 17.07 prices even higher, above its industry range.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.17

Max: 11.25
BAH: 8.17
Q3: 6.08
Median: 2.92
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

17.07

CTAS: 17.07
Max: 11.25
Q3: 6.08
Median: 2.92
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Cintas (CTAS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Cintas (CTAS)
Metric	BAH	CTAS
P/E Ratio (TTM)	13.25	43.86
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.93	7.64
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	8.17	17.07
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	7.76%	1.98%