BAH vs. TRI: Booz Allen Hamilton vs. Thomson Reuters Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) are both classified in the Research & Consulting Services sub-industry within the broader Professional Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Profile Item	BAH	TRI
Name	Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock	Thomson Reuters Corporation
Country/Region	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Commercial & Professional Services	Commercial & Professional Services
GICS Industry	Professional Services	Professional Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Research & Consulting Services	Research & Consulting Services
Market Capitalization	10.16 billion USD	48.79 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	Nasdaq
Listing Date	November 18, 2010	June 12, 2002
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BAH

TRI

GSPC

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Metric	BAH	TRI
Total Return (1Y)	2.63%	-16.97%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	-9.38%	-3.77%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	1.84%	0.07%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BAH

TRI

GSPC

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Metric	BAH	TRI
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	42.02%	52.25%
Beta (5Y)	0.29	0.73
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-66.59%	-62.87%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.79M	1.62M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

BAH and TRI are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Metric	BAH	TRI
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.04	-0.41
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.06	-0.58

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 70.00% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 14.11%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

70.00%

BAH: 70.00%
Max: 47.06%
Q3: 25.43%
Median: 14.11%
Q1: 3.92%
Min: -20.15%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

14.11%

Max: 47.06%
Q3: 25.43%
TRI: 14.11%
Median: 14.11%
Q1: 3.92%
Min: -20.15%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 19.69% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 7.14%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

7.14%

Max: 23.28%
Q3: 11.35%
BAH: 7.14%
Median: 5.65%
Q1: 0.87%
Min: -8.60%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.69%

Max: 23.28%
TRI: 19.69%
Q3: 11.35%
Median: 5.65%
Q1: 0.87%
Min: -8.60%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 21.93% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.82%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.82%

Max: 38.50%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
BAH: 8.82%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

21.93%

Max: 38.50%
TRI: 21.93%
Q3: 18.84%
Median: 10.40%
Q1: 5.59%
Min: -12.00%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Metric	BAH	TRI
ROE (TTM)	70.00%	14.11%
ROA (TTM)	8.48%	6.96%
Net Margin (TTM)	7.14%	19.69%
Operating Margin (TTM)	8.82%	21.93%
Gross Margin (TTM)	22.58%	39.72%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 3.00% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at -6.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at -4.83% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at -31.90% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Metric	BAH	TRI
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-6.37%	3.00%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	6.60%	4.10%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-4.83%	-31.90%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	50.35%	3.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 1.44 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 1.08 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for TRI.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.44

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
Median: 1.55
BAH: 1.44
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.45

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.08

Max: 3.63
Q3: 2.14
Median: 1.55
Q1: 1.09
TRI: 1.08
Min: 0.45

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 0.36 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 3.78 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

3.78

BAH: 3.78
Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.25
Median: 0.88
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.36

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.25
Median: 0.88
TRI: 0.36
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Metric	BAH	TRI
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.44	1.08
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	3.78	0.36
Net Debt / EBITDA	3.56	1.17

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 2.60% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 2.18% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.60%

Max: 4.33%
BAH: 2.60%
Q3: 1.80%
Median: 0.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.18%

Max: 4.33%
TRI: 2.18%
Q3: 1.80%
Median: 0.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 36.02% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 79.09% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

36.02%

Max: 99.58%
Q3: 41.99%
BAH: 36.02%
Median: 17.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

79.09%

Max: 99.58%
TRI: 79.09%
Q3: 41.99%
Median: 17.27%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -17.94%

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Metric	BAH	TRI
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.60%	2.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	36.02%	79.09%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 13.25 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 34.53 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

13.25

Max: 49.47
Q3: 33.76
Median: 24.16
Q1: 16.01
BAH: 13.25
Min: 1.89

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

34.53

Max: 49.47
TRI: 34.53
Q3: 33.76
Median: 24.16
Q1: 16.01
Min: 1.89

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 0.93 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 6.09 sits in the pricier quartile — TRI costs more per dollar of sales.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.93

Max: 7.17
Q3: 3.35
Median: 1.33
BAH: 0.93
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

6.09

Max: 7.17
TRI: 6.09
Q3: 3.35
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.11

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 4.35 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) at 8.17 carries an above-peer premium to book — BAH is pricier on assets.

BAH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.17

Max: 11.25
BAH: 8.17
Q3: 6.08
Median: 2.92
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

4.35

Max: 11.25
Q3: 6.08
TRI: 4.35
Median: 2.92
Q1: 1.55
Min: -2.78

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Metric	BAH	TRI
P/E Ratio (TTM)	13.25	34.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.93	6.09
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	8.17	4.35
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	7.76%	2.27%