BAC vs. GS: Bank of America vs. Goldman Sachs Stock Comparison
How do Bank of America (BAC) and Goldman Sachs (GS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Bank of America (BAC) and Goldman Sachs (GS) share the Financials sector but sit in different industry groups — BAC in Banks and GS in Financial Services.
| Profile Item | BAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Bank of America Corporation | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Banks | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Banks | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Banks | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 341.01 billion USD | 249.73 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | May 4, 1999 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -2.73% | 17.85% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 25.52% | 44.69% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 4.08% | 20.41% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 22.49% | 33.28% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.27 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.64% | -30.90% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 37.08M | 2.10M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.31 | 0.41 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.41 | 0.59 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Bank of America (BAC) at 10.73% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
BAC
Banks industry group
10.73%
- Max
- 19.84%
- Q3
- 13.67%
- Median
- 11.49%
- BAC
- 10.73%
- Q1
- 9.50%
- Min
- 3.64%
GS
Financial Services industry group
17.71%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- GS
- 17.71%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Bank of America (BAC) at 28.06%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BAC
Banks industry group
28.06%
- Max
- 47.19%
- Q3
- 35.25%
- Median
- 31.21%
- BAC
- 28.06%
- Q1
- 27.11%
- Min
- 14.93%
GS
Financial Services industry group
31.21%
- Max
- 62.84%
- GS
- 31.21%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) reports operating margin of 38.37%; Bank of America (BAC) doesn’t report a comparable line — in Banks, funding costs sit inside the core business rather than below an operating line, so profitability is better judged on net margin or ROE.
BAC
Banks industry group
--
- BAC
- --
- Max
- --
- Q3
- --
- Median
- --
- Q1
- --
- Min
- --
GS
Financial Services industry group
38.37%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- GS
- 38.37%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 10.73% | 17.71% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.94% | 1.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 28.06% | 31.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | 38.37% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Bank of America (BAC) at 6.84% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Bank of America (BAC) at 18.69% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.84% | 8.92% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.00% | 7.16% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 18.69% | 26.59% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.10% | 19.52% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Bank of America (BAC) in Banks and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Bank of America (BAC) in Banks and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Bank of America (BAC) at 2.33% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
BAC
Banks industry group
2.33%
- Max
- 5.79%
- Q3
- 3.18%
- Median
- 2.39%
- BAC
- 2.33%
- Q1
- 1.20%
- Min
- 0.00%
GS
Financial Services industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- GS
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Bank of America (BAC) at 27.62% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 25.88% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
BAC
Banks industry group
27.62%
- Max
- 70.75%
- Q3
- 41.28%
- Median
- 29.26%
- BAC
- 27.62%
- Q1
- 18.98%
- Min
- 0.00%
GS
Financial Services industry group
25.88%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- GS
- 25.88%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.33% | 2.07% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 27.62% | 25.88% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Bank of America (BAC) at 11.79 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BAC
Banks industry group
11.79
- Max
- 18.16
- Q3
- 13.75
- Median
- 11.81
- BAC
- 11.79
- Q1
- 10.64
- Min
- 6.49
GS
Financial Services industry group
12.45
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- GS
- 12.45
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) shows P/S ratio of 3.52; for Bank of America (BAC) the multiple is skipped — in Banks, income is dominated by interest spread rather than a conventional revenue line, so pricing per dollar of sales loses meaning and book- or earnings-based multiples carry the comparison.
BAC
Banks industry group
--
- BAC
- --
- Max
- --
- Q3
- --
- Median
- --
- Q1
- --
- Min
- --
GS
Financial Services industry group
3.52
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- GS
- 3.52
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Bank of America (BAC) at 1.26 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
BAC
Banks industry group
1.26
- Max
- 2.28
- Q3
- 1.58
- Median
- 1.32
- BAC
- 1.26
- Q1
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.59
GS
Financial Services industry group
2.36
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- GS
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 11.79 | 12.45 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | -- | 3.52 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.26 | 2.36 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |