BA vs. FLS: Boeing vs. Flowserve Stock Comparison
How do Boeing (BA) and Flowserve (FLS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Boeing (BA) and Flowserve (FLS) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BA is classified in Aerospace & Defense while FLS is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | BA | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Boeing Company | Flowserve Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 137.41 billion USD | 10.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BA | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -10.22% | 24.11% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.32% | 33.68% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -4.57% | 22.48% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BA | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.25% | 42.18% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 1.24 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -50.29% | -38.76% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.77M | 1.61M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BA | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.41 | 0.47 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.60 | 0.70 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Flowserve (FLS) earns 11.61% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Boeing (BA) has no ROE this period.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
- BA
- --
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
11.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FLS
- 11.61%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Boeing (BA) at 8.07% and Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
8.07%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- BA
- 8.07%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
5.42%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FLS
- 5.42%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Boeing (BA) at 0.30% operates in the bottom quartile.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
0.30%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- BA
- 0.30%
- Min
- -12.63%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
13.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- FLS
- 13.45%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BA | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -- | 11.61% |
| ROA (TTM) | -0.11% | 6.36% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.07% | 5.42% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 0.30% | 13.45% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 9.45% | 35.30% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Boeing (BA) at 34.50% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for BA.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Flowserve (FLS) reports EPS growth of 23.36%, ranked against its industry; Boeing (BA) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BA | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 34.50% | 3.76% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.33% | 9.37% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 23.36% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 22.39% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Boeing (BA) at 1.13 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for BA.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
1.13
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- BA
- 1.13
- Min
- 0.36
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.10
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- FLS
- 2.10
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Boeing (BA) at 7.39 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
7.39
- BA
- 7.39
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
0.95
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- FLS
- 0.95
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BA | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.13 | 2.10 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 7.39 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 13.81 | 2.08 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Boeing (BA) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a yield of 1.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- BA
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
1.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FLS
- 1.11%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Boeing (BA) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a payout of 43.50%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- BA
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
43.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- FLS
- 43.50%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BA | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.11% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 43.50% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Boeing (BA) at 17.89 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
17.89
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- BA
- 17.89
- Min
- 3.03
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
40.19
- Max
- 59.38
- FLS
- 40.19
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Boeing (BA) at 1.45 and Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
1.45
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- BA
- 1.45
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.17
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- FLS
- 2.17
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Boeing (BA) at 20.99 prices above its benchmark range — BA looks rich relative to book.
BA
Capital Goods industry group
20.99
- BA
- 20.99
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
4.40
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- FLS
- 4.40
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BA | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 17.89 | 40.19 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.45 | 2.17 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 20.99 | 4.40 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.44% | 3.62% |