ATI vs. SHW: ATI vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do ATI (ATI) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ATI (ATI) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ATI is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | ATI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ATI Inc. | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Steel | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 23.88 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 29, 1999 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ATI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 93.55% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 64.24% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 60.89% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ATI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 43.42% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.02% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.70M | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ATI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.06 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.23 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; ATI (ATI) at 28.73% also sits in the top quartile.
ATI
Materials industry group
28.73%
- Max
- 52.88%
- ATI
- 28.73%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both ATI (ATI) at 11.08% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ATI
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ATI
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both ATI (ATI) at 19.86% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ATI
Materials industry group
19.86%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- ATI
- 19.86%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ATI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 28.73% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.41% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.86% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 25.08% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both ATI (ATI) at 5.16% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both ATI (ATI) at 11.76% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ATI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.16% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.14% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 11.76% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 43.72% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
ATI (ATI) at 2.77 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
ATI
Materials industry group
2.77
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ATI
- 2.77
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
ATI (ATI) at 0.87 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
ATI
Materials industry group
0.87
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- ATI
- 0.87
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ATI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.77 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.87 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.36 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
ATI (ATI) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Sherwin-Williams (SHW) reports a yield of 0.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ATI
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- ATI
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
ATI (ATI) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Sherwin-Williams (SHW) reports a payout of 29.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ATI
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- ATI
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ATI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while ATI (ATI) at 43.95 sits in the richer quartile — ATI needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
ATI
Materials industry group
43.95
- Max
- 59.00
- ATI
- 43.95
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while ATI (ATI) at 4.76 sits in the pricier quartile — ATI costs more per dollar of sales.
ATI
Materials industry group
4.76
- Max
- 9.62
- ATI
- 4.76
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both ATI (ATI) at 11.91 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
ATI
Materials industry group
11.91
- ATI
- 11.91
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ATI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 43.95 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.76 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 11.91 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.01% | 2.98% |