Seek Returns

ARMK vs. YUMC: Aramark vs. Yum China Stock Comparison

How do Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC) are both classified in the Restaurants sub-industry within the broader Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC)
Profile ItemARMKYUMC
NameAramarkYum China Holdings, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS Industry GroupConsumer ServicesConsumer Services
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
GICS Sub-IndustryRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Capitalization13.85 billion USD16.79 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 2013October 17, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

ARMK
YUMC
GSPC
Loading price history…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC)
MetricARMKYUMC
Total Return (1Y)45.95%17.02%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)26.55%6.80%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)15.73%-0.60%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

ARMK
YUMC
GSPC
Loading price history…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC)
MetricARMKYUMC
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)27.91%25.40%
Beta (5Y)1.080.01
Max Drawdown (5Y)-27.63%-53.84%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.66M1.59M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
ARMK and YUMC are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC)
MetricARMKYUMC
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.490.50
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.440.77

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Aramark (ARMK) at 11.69% and Yum China (YUMC) at 17.35% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

11.69%

Max
76.75%
Q3
34.07%
Median
15.90%
ARMK
11.69%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-40.61%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

17.35%

Max
76.75%
Q3
34.07%
YUMC
17.35%
Median
15.90%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-40.61%
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their ROE against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Aramark (ARMK) at 1.93% and Yum China (YUMC) at 7.90% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

1.93%

Max
25.52%
Q3
12.95%
Median
6.63%
ARMK
1.93%
Q1
1.46%
Min
-14.36%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

7.90%

Max
25.52%
Q3
12.95%
YUMC
7.90%
Median
6.63%
Q1
1.46%
Min
-14.36%
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their net margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Yum China (YUMC) at 13.09% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Aramark (ARMK) at 4.42% operates in the bottom quartile.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

4.42%

Max
49.05%
Q3
24.35%
Median
14.23%
Q1
5.67%
ARMK
4.42%
Min
-16.47%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

13.09%

Max
49.05%
Q3
24.35%
Median
14.23%
YUMC
13.09%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-16.47%
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their operating margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC)
MetricARMKYUMC
ROE (TTM)11.69%17.35%
ROA (TTM)4.24%7.81%
Net Margin (TTM)1.93%7.90%
Operating Margin (TTM)4.42%13.09%
Gross Margin (TTM)15.29%20.45%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Aramark (ARMK) at 6.35% and Yum China (YUMC) at 4.37% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Aramark (ARMK) at 23.23% and Yum China (YUMC) at 7.73% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC)
MetricARMKYUMC
Revenue Growth (YoY)6.35%4.37%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)10.58%7.23%
EPS Growth (YoY)23.23%7.73%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)17.09%34.14%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Aramark (ARMK) at 1.29 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Yum China (YUMC) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for YUMC.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

1.29

Max
3.41
Q3
1.85
ARMK
1.29
Median
1.06
Q1
0.72
Min
0.22

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

0.67

Max
3.41
Q3
1.85
Median
1.06
Q1
0.72
YUMC
0.67
Min
0.22
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their current ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Aramark (ARMK) at 1.87 and Yum China (YUMC) at 0.54 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

1.87

Max
6.12
Q3
2.93
ARMK
1.87
Median
1.29
Q1
0.37
Min
0.01

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

0.54

Max
6.12
Q3
2.93
Median
1.29
YUMC
0.54
Q1
0.37
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC)
MetricARMKYUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.290.67
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.870.54
Net Debt / EBITDA4.120.85

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Yum China (YUMC) at 2.23% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Aramark (ARMK) at 0.95% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, YUMC the richer one.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

0.95%

Max
4.10%
Q3
1.82%
ARMK
0.95%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

2.23%

Max
4.10%
YUMC
2.23%
Q3
1.82%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Aramark (ARMK) at 32.52% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Yum China (YUMC) at 38.54% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

32.52%

Max
89.80%
Q3
36.83%
ARMK
32.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

38.54%

Max
89.80%
YUMC
38.54%
Q3
36.83%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC)
MetricARMKYUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.95%2.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.52%38.54%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Aramark (ARMK) at 36.74 and Yum China (YUMC) at 17.34 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

36.74

Max
71.70
Q3
37.12
ARMK
36.74
Median
21.88
Q1
13.00
Min
5.72

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

17.34

Max
71.70
Q3
37.12
Median
21.88
YUMC
17.34
Q1
13.00
Min
5.72
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Aramark (ARMK) at 0.70 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Yum China (YUMC) at 1.32 prices around its industry’s middle — ARMK costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

0.70

Max
6.40
Q3
3.01
Median
1.54
Q1
0.74
ARMK
0.70
Min
0.08

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

1.32

Max
6.40
Q3
3.01
Median
1.54
YUMC
1.32
Q1
0.74
Min
0.08
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Aramark (ARMK) at 4.08 and Yum China (YUMC) at 3.19 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

4.08

Max
12.02
Q3
5.58
ARMK
4.08
Median
2.37
Q1
1.09
Min
-4.51

YUMC

Consumer Services industry group

3.19

Max
12.02
Q3
5.58
YUMC
3.19
Median
2.37
Q1
1.09
Min
-4.51
Loading chart…
Aramark (ARMK) vs. Yum China (YUMC): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China (YUMC)
MetricARMKYUMC
P/E Ratio (TTM)36.7417.34
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.701.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.083.19
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.70%-2.30%