APO vs. GPN: Apollo Global Management vs. Global Payments Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Global Payments (GPN) both belong to the Financial Services industry, though APO is classified under Diversified Financial Services while GPN falls under Transaction & Payment Processing Services.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% and Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% produce bottom-quartile ROE versus peers, pointing to weaker profit generation on shareholders’ equity.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at -3.01% and Global Payments (GPN) at -11.21% report negative net margin values, usually indicating net losses over the period.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Global Payments (GPN) reports 15.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Apollo Global Management (APO) at 22.73% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.87% and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Apollo Global Management (APO) reports 75.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Global Payments (GPN) trades at 173.93 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 and Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics