APO vs. BRK.A: Apollo Global Management vs. Berkshire Hathaway Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) both belong to the Financial Services industry, though APO is classified under Diversified Financial Services while BRK.A falls under Multi-Sector Holdings.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Apollo Global Management (APO) has an aggressive beta of 1.47, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) is defensive at 0.56 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Apollo Global Management (APO) trades around 3.35M shares per day on average, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) sees only 206 — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at 12.12% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) reports 22.30%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) reports 32.56%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Apollo Global Management (APO) at 22.73% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at -3.23% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at -24.78% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a yield of 1.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a payout of 75.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) trades at 14.36 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at 3.18 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) at 1.72 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics