APO vs. FIS: Apollo Global Management vs. Fidelity Natl Information Svcs Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Apollo Global Management (APO) and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) both belong to the Financial Services industry, though APO is classified under Diversified Financial Services while FIS falls under Transaction & Payment Processing Services.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 23.04% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.89% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative net margin of -3.01%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) reports 26.77%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Apollo Global Management (APO) reports a negative operating margin of -44.34%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) reports 22.93%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 22.73% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.43% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at -24.42% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at -72.03% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Apollo Global Management (APO) in Financial Services and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 1.87% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, FIS the richer one.

Both Apollo Global Management (APO) at 75.00% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 25.71% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) trades at 4.29 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Apollo Global Management (APO) has no P/E ratio this period.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 1.14 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 2.26 prices around its industry’s middle — FIS costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 0.91 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Apollo Global Management (APO) at 4.32 carries an above-peer premium to book — APO is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics