APH vs. QUBT: Amphenol vs. Quantum Computing Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Amphenol (APH) and Quantum Computing (QUBT) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but APH is classified in Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components while QUBT is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.

Amphenol (APH) is a large-cap at 184.18 billion USD, while Quantum Computing (QUBT) is small-cap at 1.43 billion USD — a noticeable scale difference that may affect liquidity, analyst coverage, and risk profile.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantum Computing (QUBT) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.90, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Amphenol (APH) is closer to market-like at 1.27 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a negative ROE of -1.51%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports 40.08%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a negative net margin of -152.45%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports 17.95%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a negative operating margin of -281.27%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports 29.68%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 82.84% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Amphenol (APH) at 51.71% also sits in the top quartile.

Only one side can be read here: Amphenol (APH) reports EPS growth of 73.96%, ranked against its industry; Quantum Computing (QUBT) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Amphenol (APH) at 1.94 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 53.14 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Amphenol (APH) at 1.03 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Quantum Computing (QUBT) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports a yield of 0.70%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Amphenol (APH) reports a payout of 21.74%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Amphenol (APH) trades at 32.43 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Quantum Computing (QUBT) has no P/E ratio this period.

Amphenol (APH) at 5.57 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 145.84 clears its benchmark range — QUBT looks notably rich on sales.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 0.90 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Amphenol (APH) at 10.75 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics