ANET vs. QUBT: Arista Networks vs. Quantum Computing Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Arista Networks (ANET) and Quantum Computing (QUBT) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but ANET is classified in Communications Equipment while QUBT is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.

Arista Networks (ANET) is a mega-cap company at 215.79 billion USD, while Quantum Computing (QUBT) is small-cap at 1.43 billion USD. The scale gap is wide enough that investor expectations, liquidity, and risk profile may differ materially.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a negative ROE of -1.51%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Arista Networks (ANET) reports 33.52%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a negative net margin of -152.45%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Arista Networks (ANET) reports 39.97%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a negative operating margin of -281.27%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Arista Networks (ANET) reports 44.90%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 82.84% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Arista Networks (ANET) at 28.60% also sits in the top quartile.

Only one side can be read here: Arista Networks (ANET) reports EPS growth of 23.32%, ranked against its industry; Quantum Computing (QUBT) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Arista Networks (ANET) at 3.29 and Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 53.14 post current ratio above their industries’ typical mid-ranges — short-term liquidity appears comfortable, though unusually high readings can point to idle current assets.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Quantum Computing (QUBT) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 against its industry range, while Arista Networks (ANET) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Arista Networks (ANET) nor Quantum Computing (QUBT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Arista Networks (ANET) nor Quantum Computing (QUBT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Arista Networks (ANET) trades at 45.79 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Quantum Computing (QUBT) has no P/E ratio this period.

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both Arista Networks (ANET) at 18.15 and Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 145.84 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 0.90 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Arista Networks (ANET) at 13.12 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.

Valuation Metrics