CSCO vs. QUBT: Cisco Systems vs. Quantum Computing Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cisco Systems (CSCO) and Quantum Computing (QUBT) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but CSCO is classified in Communications Equipment while QUBT is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.

Cisco Systems (CSCO) is a mega-cap company at 370.01 billion USD, while Quantum Computing (QUBT) is small-cap at 1.43 billion USD. The scale gap is wide enough that investor expectations, liquidity, and risk profile may differ materially.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantum Computing (QUBT) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.90, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Cisco Systems (CSCO) is closer to market-like at 1.02 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a negative ROE of -1.51%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Cisco Systems (CSCO) reports 27.32%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a negative net margin of -152.45%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Cisco Systems (CSCO) reports 20.95%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a negative operating margin of -281.27%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Cisco Systems (CSCO) reports 27.72%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 82.84% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Cisco Systems (CSCO) at 11.78%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Neither Cisco Systems (CSCO) nor Quantum Computing (QUBT) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 53.14 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cisco Systems (CSCO) at 0.93 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cisco Systems (CSCO) at 0.62 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Quantum Computing (QUBT) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cisco Systems (CSCO) reports a yield of 1.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cisco Systems (CSCO) reports a payout of 49.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Cisco Systems (CSCO) trades at 28.18 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Quantum Computing (QUBT) has no P/E ratio this period.

Both look expensive on sales: Cisco Systems (CSCO) at 5.84 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 145.84 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) at 0.90 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Cisco Systems (CSCO) at 7.36 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics