AAPL vs. ANET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and ANET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dwarfs ANET in market cap, clocking in at 3,018.38 billion USD—about 26.00 times the 116.08 billion USD of its counterpart.
AAPL at 1.27 and ANET at 1.39 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | AAPL | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Arista Networks, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 92.43 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 116.08 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.275 | 1.387 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | June 6, 2014 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and ANET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and ANET, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AAPL | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 38.46 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 2.11 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 15.61 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 11.51 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 30.67 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 35.66 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 15.36 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 30.18 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL’s 0.50% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike ANET, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits AAPL’s balanced approach against ANET’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | AAPL | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and ANET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL posts a current ratio of 0.82 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to ANET, sitting at 3.93, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- AAPL’s quick ratio sits at 0.78 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, ANET lands at 3.31, with enough liquidity to spare.
- For AAPL and ANET, interest coverage shows as “--”, pointing to negligible interest costs—often a sign of slim debt or rock-bottom rates keeping expenses near zero.
| Symbol | AAPL | ANET |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 3.93 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 3.31 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |