APA vs. PSX: APA vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison
How do APA (APA) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
APA (APA) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though APA is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Profile Item | APA | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Name | APA Corporation | Phillips 66 |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 14.98 billion USD | 95.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 15, 1979 | April 12, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | APA | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 92.90% | 88.91% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.25% | 36.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 11.68% | 30.83% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | APA | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 44.92% | 33.42% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.34 | 0.72 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -70.47% | -44.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 5.66M | 2.92M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | APA | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.97 | 2.53 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.94 | 3.93 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both APA (APA) at 33.32% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
APA
Energy industry group
33.32%
- Max
- 53.85%
- APA
- 33.32%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PSX
Energy industry group
39.84%
- Max
- 53.85%
- PSX
- 39.84%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
APA (APA) at 23.49% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
APA
Energy industry group
23.49%
- Max
- 56.92%
- APA
- 23.49%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PSX
Energy industry group
7.48%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- PSX
- 7.48%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
APA (APA) at 44.25% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
APA
Energy industry group
44.25%
- Max
- 71.31%
- APA
- 44.25%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PSX
Energy industry group
13.17%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- PSX
- 13.17%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | APA | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 33.32% | 39.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 14.06% | 10.64% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 23.49% | 7.48% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.25% | 13.17% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 78.98% | 15.08% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both APA (APA) at -8.39% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
Both APA (APA) at 75.77% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | APA | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.39% | -7.53% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -6.96% | -8.00% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 75.77% | 116.23% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -28.73% | -22.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while APA (APA) at 0.85 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for APA.
APA
Energy industry group
0.85
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- APA
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.24
PSX
Energy industry group
1.34
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- PSX
- 1.34
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both APA (APA) at 0.42 and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
APA
Energy industry group
0.42
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- APA
- 0.42
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
PSX
Energy industry group
0.52
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- PSX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | APA | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.42 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.53 | 0.82 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both APA (APA) at 2.30% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
APA
Energy industry group
2.30%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- APA
- 2.30%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PSX
Energy industry group
2.03%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- PSX
- 2.03%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both APA (APA) at 16.26% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
APA
Energy industry group
16.26%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- APA
- 16.26%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PSX
Energy industry group
16.07%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- PSX
- 16.07%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | APA | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.30% | 2.03% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 16.26% | 16.07% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
APA (APA) at 7.26 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for APA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
APA
Energy industry group
7.26
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- APA
- 7.26
- Min
- 2.99
PSX
Energy industry group
7.88
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- PSX
- 7.88
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while APA (APA) at 1.62 prices around its industry’s middle — PSX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
APA
Energy industry group
1.62
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- APA
- 1.62
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
PSX
Energy industry group
0.57
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- PSX
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
APA (APA) at 2.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — PSX is pricier on assets.
APA
Energy industry group
2.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- APA
- 2.11
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PSX
Energy industry group
2.79
- Max
- 4.21
- PSX
- 2.79
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | APA | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 7.26 | 7.88 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.62 | 0.57 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.11 | 2.79 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 14.08% | 9.93% |