AMP vs. NMR: Ameriprise Financial vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Ameriprise Financial (AMP) and Nomura (NMR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though AMP is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while NMR falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Ameriprise Financial (AMP) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 71.98% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Nomura (NMR) at 11.51%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Both Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 20.67% and Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 36.41% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 7.04% and Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 9.77% and Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Ameriprise Financial (AMP) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Ameriprise Financial (AMP) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 1.30% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Both Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 14.86% and Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 11.29 and Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 2.16 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Ameriprise Financial (AMP) at 8.54 prices above its benchmark range — AMP looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics