AKAM vs. SNOW: Akamai vs. Snowflake Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Akamai (AKAM) and Snowflake (SNOW) are both classified in the Internet Services & Infrastructure sub-industry within the broader IT Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Akamai (AKAM) has more than two decades of public-market history since October 29, 1999, whereas Snowflake (SNOW) listed on September 16, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Snowflake (SNOW) has an aggressive beta of 1.33, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Akamai (AKAM) is defensive at 0.69 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Snowflake (SNOW) reports a negative ROE of -48.06%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Akamai (AKAM) reports 7.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Snowflake (SNOW) reports a negative net margin of -20.07%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Akamai (AKAM) reports 8.84%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Snowflake (SNOW) reports a negative operating margin of -17.00%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Akamai (AKAM) reports 9.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Snowflake (SNOW) at 29.16% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Akamai (AKAM) at 5.44% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Only one side can be read here: Akamai (AKAM) reports EPS growth of -6.12%, ranked against its industry; Snowflake (SNOW) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Akamai (AKAM) at 2.13 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Snowflake (SNOW) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SNOW.

Both Akamai (AKAM) at 1.84 and Snowflake (SNOW) at 1.29 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Akamai (AKAM) nor Snowflake (SNOW) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Akamai (AKAM) nor Snowflake (SNOW) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Akamai (AKAM) trades at 32.33 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Snowflake (SNOW) has no P/E ratio this period.

Akamai (AKAM) at 2.72 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Snowflake (SNOW) at 17.91 sits in the pricier quartile — SNOW costs more per dollar of sales.

Akamai (AKAM) at 2.32 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Snowflake (SNOW) at 45.23 prices above its benchmark range — SNOW looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics