Seek Returns logo

AKAM vs. MSFT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AKAM and MSFT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAKAMMSFT
Company NameAkamai Technologies, Inc.Microsoft Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization12.73 billion USD3,776.90 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 29, 1999March 13, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AKAM and MSFT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AKAM vs. MSFT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMSFT
5-Day Price Return0.06%-0.23%
13-Week Price Return17.13%-1.86%
26-Week Price Return10.43%12.04%
52-Week Price Return-1.78%18.88%
Month-to-Date Return16.07%-1.99%
Year-to-Date Return-8.87%20.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.36M23.89M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.07M20.87M
3-Month Volatility38.93%16.65%
Beta0.661.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AKAM

10.86%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

AKAM’s Return on Equity of 10.86% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MSFT

31.53%

Software Industry

Max
65.88%
Q3
22.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
-6.54%
Min
-41.05%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 31.53% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

12.26%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.26% places AKAM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MSFT

35.71%

Software Industry

Max
53.50%
Q3
20.30%
Median
9.60%
Q1
-4.98%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 35.71% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AKAM

15.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

AKAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.00% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MSFT

45.94%

Software Industry

Max
61.99%
Q3
23.67%
Median
10.93%
Q1
-3.57%
Min
-40.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.94% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMSFT
Return on Equity (TTM)10.86%31.53%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.86%17.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.26%35.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.00%45.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.13%68.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.28

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

AKAM’s Current Ratio of 2.28 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MSFT

1.40

Software Industry

Max
4.01
Q3
2.27
Median
1.50
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

0.87

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

AKAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.87 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSFT

0.27

Software Industry

Max
2.04
Q3
0.86
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

85.36

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

AKAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.36 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
33.82
Median
1.59
Q1
-10.48
Min
-71.23

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMSFT
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.281.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.981.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.870.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.36891.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

AKAM vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AKAM vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MSFT

0.65%

Software Industry

Max
0.34%
Q3
0.17%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AKAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MSFT

23.52%

Software Industry

Max
12.76%
Q3
6.56%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.52%, MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMSFT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%23.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

24.74

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

AKAM’s P/E Ratio of 24.74 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MSFT

36.14

Software Industry

Max
142.78
Q3
72.24
Median
36.21
Q1
24.24
Min
4.55

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 36.14 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AKAM

3.03

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

AKAM’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MSFT

12.91

Software Industry

Max
20.79
Q3
12.71
Median
6.75
Q1
4.56
Min
0.87

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 12.91 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AKAM

2.30

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

AKAM’s P/B Ratio of 2.30 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MSFT

10.60

Software Industry

Max
30.49
Q3
14.84
Median
8.09
Q1
4.32
Min
0.38

MSFT’s P/B Ratio of 10.60 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AKAM vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAKAMMSFT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.7436.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.0312.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.3010.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.3848.60