Seek Returns logo

MSFT vs. SNOW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MSFT and SNOW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMSFTSNOW
Company NameMicrosoft CorporationSnowflake Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareIT Services
Market Capitalization3,759.10 billion USD65.00 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 13, 1986September 16, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MSFT and SNOW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MSFT vs. SNOW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMSFTSNOW
5-Day Price Return-3.21%-0.05%
13-Week Price Return10.21%7.00%
26-Week Price Return23.18%1.11%
52-Week Price Return19.97%48.23%
Month-to-Date Return-5.21%-12.84%
Year-to-Date Return19.98%26.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume20.86M4.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume20.58M4.33M
3-Month Volatility15.87%41.71%
Beta1.041.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MSFT

32.44%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 32.44% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SNOW

-44.88%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

SNOW has a negative Return on Equity of -44.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MSFT

36.15%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 36.15% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SNOW

-36.43%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

SNOW has a negative Net Profit Margin of -36.43%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MSFT

45.29%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.29% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SNOW

-41.37%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

SNOW has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -41.37%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMSFTSNOW
Return on Equity (TTM)32.44%-44.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.20%-17.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)36.15%-36.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.29%-41.37%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.82%66.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

1.35

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNOW

1.58

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

SNOW’s Current Ratio of 1.58 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

0.26

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SNOW

0.94

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

SNOW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SNOW

--

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMSFTSNOW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.351.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.351.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.260.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)891.80--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MSFT vs. SNOW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MSFT vs. SNOW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MSFT

0.64%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNOW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

23.65%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.65%, MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNOW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMSFTSNOW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.65%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

37.23

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 37.23 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SNOW

--

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

P/E Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

13.46

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 13.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SNOW

16.88

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 16.88, SNOW trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

10.76

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

MSFT’s P/B Ratio of 10.76 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SNOW

22.13

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

At 22.13, SNOW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MSFT vs. SNOW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMSFTSNOW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.23--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)13.4616.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.7622.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)52.9488.05