PS vs. ROP: Pershing Square vs. Roper Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Pershing Square (PS) and Roper (ROP) are both classified in the Application Software sub-industry within the broader Software industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Roper (ROP) has been public since February 13, 1992, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Pershing Square (PS) listed only on April 29, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Pershing Square (PS) has a highly aggressive beta of 6.25, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Roper (ROP) is defensive at 0.66 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both PS and ROP need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Roper (ROP) earns 13.23% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Pershing Square (PS) has no ROE this period.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative net margin of -20.98%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Roper (ROP) reports 30.71%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative operating margin of -35.45%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Roper (ROP) reports 28.70%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Pershing Square (PS) at 64.66% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Roper (ROP) at 12.26%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Only one side can be read here: Roper (ROP) reports EPS growth of -1.05%, ranked against its industry; Pershing Square (PS) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Short-term liquidity can only be read on one side of this pairing: Roper (ROP) shows current ratio of 0.43 against its industry benchmark, while Pershing Square (PS) has no reading this period.

Both Pershing Square (PS) at 0.18 and Roper (ROP) at 0.51 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Pershing Square (PS) at 0.24% and Roper (ROP) at 0.74% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Pershing Square (PS) reports a negative payout ratio of -10.99%, usually because earnings are negative; the payout ratio is not a useful dividend-sustainability benchmark in that state. Meanwhile Roper (ROP) reports 14.07%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Roper (ROP) trades at 18.86 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Pershing Square (PS) has no P/E ratio this period.

Roper (ROP) at 5.60 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Pershing Square (PS) at 27.11 clears its benchmark range — PS looks notably rich on sales.

Roper (ROP) at 2.46 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Pershing Square (PS) at 15.12 carries an above-peer premium to book — PS is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics