PH vs. XYL: Parker-Hannifin vs. Xylem Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL)
Profile Item	PH	XYL
Name	Parker-Hannifin Corporation	Xylem Inc.
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Machinery	Machinery
GICS Sub-Industry	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization	115.73 billion USD	22.44 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	October 13, 2011
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

XYL

GSPC

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL)
Metric	PH	XYL
Total Return (1Y)	14.13%	-33.10%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	33.71%	2.29%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	25.35%	-4.47%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

XYL

GSPC

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL)
Metric	PH	XYL
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	27.33%	30.74%
Beta (5Y)	1.12	0.96
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-28.64%	-44.89%
Avg. Volume (3M)	627.57K	2.60M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

PH and XYL are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL)
Metric	PH	XYL
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.36	-1.22
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.53	-1.48

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Xylem (XYL) at 9.76% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max: 40.55%
PH: 24.95%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

9.76%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
XYL: 9.76%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Xylem (XYL) at 11.94%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max: 27.47%
PH: 16.62%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

11.94%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
XYL: 11.94%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Xylem (XYL) at 15.95%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max: 36.60%
PH: 21.90%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

15.95%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
XYL: 15.95%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL)
Metric	PH	XYL
ROE (TTM)	24.95%	9.76%
ROA (TTM)	8.56%	5.07%
Net Margin (TTM)	16.62%	11.94%
Operating Margin (TTM)	21.90%	15.95%
Gross Margin (TTM)	37.70%	39.32%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% and Xylem (XYL) at 5.52% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% and Xylem (XYL) at 7.40% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL)
Metric	PH	XYL
Revenue Growth (YoY)	8.31%	5.52%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	4.09%	17.84%
EPS Growth (YoY)	5.01%	7.40%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	21.09%	25.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 and Xylem (XYL) at 1.39 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
PH: 0.94
Min: 0.36

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

1.39

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
XYL: 1.39
Min: 0.36

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 and Xylem (XYL) at 0.29 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
PH: 1.09
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

0.29

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
XYL: 0.29
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL)
Metric	PH	XYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.94	1.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.09	0.29
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.81	1.18

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Xylem (XYL) at 1.69% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, XYL the richer one.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
PH: 0.85%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

1.69%

Max: 2.66%
XYL: 1.69%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Xylem (XYL) at 37.47% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
PH: 26.11%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

37.47%

Max: 67.39%
XYL: 37.47%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL)
Metric	PH	XYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.85%	1.69%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	26.11%	37.47%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 and Xylem (XYL) at 21.69 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
PH: 31.53
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

21.69

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
XYL: 21.69
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Xylem (XYL) at 2.48 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max: 7.54
PH: 5.16
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

2.48

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
XYL: 2.48
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Xylem (XYL) at 2.19 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max: 9.66
PH: 7.25
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

XYL

Capital Goods industry group

2.19

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
XYL: 2.19
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Xylem (XYL): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Xylem (XYL)
Metric	PH	XYL
P/E Ratio (TTM)	31.53	21.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)	5.16	2.48
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	7.25	2.19
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.45%	5.39%