PH vs. VRT: Parker-Hannifin vs. Vertiv Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but PH is classified in Machinery while VRT is classified in Electrical Equipment.

Company profile comparison for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT)
Profile Item	PH	VRT
Name	Parker-Hannifin Corporation	Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Machinery	Electrical Equipment
GICS Sub-Industry	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components	Electrical Components & Equipment
Market Capitalization	115.73 billion USD	70.41 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	August 2, 2018
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

VRT

GSPC

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	PH	VRT
Total Return (1Y)	14.13%	11.12%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	33.71%	71.14%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	25.35%	49.38%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

VRT

GSPC

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Vertiv (VRT) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.15, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Parker-Hannifin (PH) is closer to market-like at 1.12 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk profile metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	PH	VRT
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	27.33%	71.11%
Beta (5Y)	1.12	2.15
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-28.64%	-69.52%
Avg. Volume (3M)	627.57K	5.90M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

PH and VRT are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	PH	VRT
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.36	0.10
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.53	0.14

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both companies show strong equity returns, but Vertiv (VRT) at 46.57% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% also sits in the top quartile.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max: 40.55%
PH: 24.95%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

46.57%

VRT: 46.57%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% and Vertiv (VRT) at 16.00% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max: 27.47%
PH: 16.62%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

16.00%

Max: 27.47%
VRT: 16.00%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% and Vertiv (VRT) at 23.77% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max: 36.60%
PH: 21.90%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

23.77%

Max: 36.60%
VRT: 23.77%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	PH	VRT
ROE (TTM)	24.95%	46.57%
ROA (TTM)	8.56%	11.94%
Net Margin (TTM)	16.62%	16.00%
Operating Margin (TTM)	21.90%	23.77%
Gross Margin (TTM)	37.70%	38.12%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Vertiv (VRT) at 27.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for VRT.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Vertiv (VRT) at 166.41% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	PH	VRT
Revenue Growth (YoY)	8.31%	27.69%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	4.09%	21.59%
EPS Growth (YoY)	5.01%	166.41%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	21.09%	340.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 and Vertiv (VRT) at 1.39 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
PH: 0.94
Min: 0.36

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

1.39

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
VRT: 1.39
Min: 0.36

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 and Vertiv (VRT) at 0.61 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
PH: 1.09
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

0.61

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
VRT: 0.61
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	PH	VRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.94	1.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.09	0.61
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.81	-0.11

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% and Vertiv (VRT) at 0.11% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
PH: 0.85%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

0.11%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
VRT: 0.11%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% and Vertiv (VRT) at 4.67% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
PH: 26.11%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

4.67%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
VRT: 4.67%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	PH	VRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.85%	0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	26.11%	4.67%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 and Vertiv (VRT) at 34.18 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
PH: 31.53
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

34.18

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
VRT: 34.18
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 and Vertiv (VRT) at 5.37 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max: 7.54
PH: 5.16
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

5.37

Max: 7.54
VRT: 5.37
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Vertiv (VRT) at 12.80 prices even higher, above its industry range.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max: 9.66
PH: 7.25
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

12.80

VRT: 12.80
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	PH	VRT
P/E Ratio (TTM)	31.53	34.18
P/S Ratio (TTM)	5.16	5.37
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	7.25	12.80
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.45%	4.21%