PH vs. SYM: Parker-Hannifin vs. Symbotic Stock Comparison
How do Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Symbotic (SYM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Symbotic (SYM) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Parker-Hannifin (PH) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, whereas Symbotic (SYM) listed on March 9, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.
| Profile Item | PH | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Parker-Hannifin Corporation | Symbotic Inc. Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 115.73 billion USD | 22.29 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 9, 2021 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | PH | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 14.13% | -44.66% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.71% | 6.78% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 25.35% | 30.90% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Symbotic (SYM) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.05, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Parker-Hannifin (PH) is closer to market-like at 1.12 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | PH | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.33% | 78.15% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 2.05 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -28.64% | -72.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 627.57K | 1.61M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | PH | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.36 | -0.63 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.53 | -0.93 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Symbotic (SYM) at 4.39% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
24.95%
- Max
- 40.55%
- PH
- 24.95%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
4.39%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- SYM
- 4.39%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Symbotic (SYM) at 0.31% keeps a bottom-quartile share.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
16.62%
- Max
- 27.47%
- PH
- 16.62%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
0.31%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- SYM
- 0.31%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while Symbotic (SYM) at 4.59% operates in the bottom quartile.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
21.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- PH
- 21.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
4.59%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- SYM
- 4.59%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | PH | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 24.95% | 4.39% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.56% | 0.32% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.62% | 0.31% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 21.90% | 4.59% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 37.70% | 21.27% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Symbotic (SYM) at 25.65% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for SYM.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports EPS growth of 5.01%, ranked against its industry; Symbotic (SYM) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | PH | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.31% | 25.65% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.09% | 55.87% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 5.01% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 21.09% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 and Symbotic (SYM) at 1.33 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PH
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
1.33
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- SYM
- 1.33
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Symbotic (SYM) at 0.02 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
1.09
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PH
- 1.09
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
0.02
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- SYM
- 0.02
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | PH | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.94 | 1.33 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.09 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.81 | -30.44 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Symbotic (SYM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a yield of 0.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.85%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- PH
- 0.85%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- SYM
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Symbotic (SYM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a payout of 26.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
26.11%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- PH
- 26.11%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- SYM
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | PH | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.85% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 26.11% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Symbotic (SYM) at 460.25 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for SYM’s trailing earnings.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
31.53
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- PH
- 31.53
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
460.25
- SYM
- 460.25
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on sales: Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Symbotic (SYM) at 8.42 prices even higher, above its industry range.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
5.16
- Max
- 7.54
- PH
- 5.16
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
8.42
- SYM
- 8.42
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 and Symbotic (SYM) at 6.70 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
PH
Capital Goods industry group
7.25
- Max
- 9.66
- PH
- 7.25
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
6.70
- Max
- 9.66
- SYM
- 6.70
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PH | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 31.53 | 460.25 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.16 | 8.42 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.25 | 6.70 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.45% | 2.46% |