Seek Returns

PH vs. SNA: Parker-Hannifin vs. Snap-on Stock Comparison

How do Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA)
Profile ItemPHSNA
NameParker-Hannifin CorporationSnap-on Incorporated
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryMachinery
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization115.73 billion USD18.94 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

PH
SNA
GSPC
Loading price history…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA)
MetricPHSNA
Total Return (1Y)14.13%12.48%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)33.71%15.36%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)25.35%14.84%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

PH
SNA
GSPC
Loading price history…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA)
MetricPHSNA
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)27.33%19.41%
Beta (5Y)1.120.73
Max Drawdown (5Y)-28.64%-20.77%
Avg. Volume (3M)627.57K333.56K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
PH and SNA are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA)
MetricPHSNA
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.360.42
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.530.63

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Snap-on (SNA) at 17.32% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max
40.55%
PH
24.95%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

17.32%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
SNA
17.32%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% and Snap-on (SNA) at 19.21% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max
27.47%
PH
16.62%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

19.21%

Max
27.47%
SNA
19.21%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% and Snap-on (SNA) at 24.88% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max
36.60%
PH
21.90%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

24.88%

Max
36.60%
SNA
24.88%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA)
MetricPHSNA
ROE (TTM)24.95%17.32%
ROA (TTM)8.56%9.70%
Net Margin (TTM)16.62%19.21%
Operating Margin (TTM)21.90%24.88%
Gross Margin (TTM)37.70%51.87%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Snap-on (SNA) at 0.93% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% and Snap-on (SNA) at -1.64% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA)
MetricPHSNA
Revenue Growth (YoY)8.31%0.93%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)4.09%2.11%
EPS Growth (YoY)5.01%-1.64%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)21.09%4.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Snap-on (SNA) at 3.55 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
PH
0.94
Min
0.36

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

3.55

Max
5.22
SNA
3.55
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Snap-on (SNA) at 0.21 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
PH
1.09
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

0.21

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
SNA
0.21
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA)
MetricPHSNA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.943.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.090.21
Net Debt / EBITDA2.81-0.26

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Snap-on (SNA) at 2.66% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, SNA the richer one.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
PH
0.85%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

2.66%

SNA
2.66%
Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Snap-on (SNA) at 50.70% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
PH
26.11%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

50.70%

Max
67.39%
SNA
50.70%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA)
MetricPHSNA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%2.66%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.11%50.70%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Snap-on (SNA) at 19.08 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for SNA, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
PH
31.53
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

19.08

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
SNA
19.08
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Snap-on (SNA) at 3.60 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max
7.54
PH
5.16
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

3.60

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
SNA
3.60
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Snap-on (SNA) at 3.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max
9.66
PH
7.25
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

SNA

Capital Goods industry group

3.11

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
SNA
3.11
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Snap-on (SNA): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Parker-Hannifin (PH) and Snap-on (SNA)
MetricPHSNA
P/E Ratio (TTM)31.5319.08
P/S Ratio (TTM)5.163.60
P/B Ratio (MRQ)7.253.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.45%5.77%