PH vs. QXO: Parker-Hannifin vs. QXO Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Parker-Hannifin (PH) and QXO (QXO) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but PH is classified in Machinery while QXO is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

QXO (QXO) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.28, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Parker-Hannifin (PH) is closer to market-like at 1.12 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

QXO (QXO) is heavily traded at around 19.01M shares per day, whereas Parker-Hannifin (PH) sees a more moderate 627.57K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

QXO (QXO) reports a negative ROE of -4.60%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports 24.95%, ranking against industry peers normally.

QXO (QXO) reports a negative net margin of -5.17%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports 16.62%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while QXO (QXO) at 1.29% operates in the bottom quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

QXO (QXO) at 11,924.96% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while QXO (QXO) at -672.73% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

QXO (QXO) at 4.12 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Both Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 and QXO (QXO) at 0.57 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a yield of 0.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a payout of 26.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Parker-Hannifin (PH) trades at 31.53 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while QXO (QXO) has no P/E ratio this period.

QXO (QXO) at 1.21 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.

QXO (QXO) at 0.90 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics