PBA vs. WDS: Pembina Pipeline vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison
How do Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though PBA is classified under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation while WDS falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Pembina Pipeline Corp. | Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR |
| Country/Region | Canada | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 28.08 billion USD | 40.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 6, 2010 | November 18, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.84% | 30.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 20.26% | 5.67% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.46% | 11.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 20.43% | 33.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.59 | 0.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -27.37% | -48.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 993.87K | 570.04K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.54 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.32 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 12.10% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
PBA
Energy industry group
12.10%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- PBA
- 12.10%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WDS
Energy industry group
7.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- WDS
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 24.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
PBA
Energy industry group
24.78%
- Max
- 56.92%
- PBA
- 24.78%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WDS
Energy industry group
22.21%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- WDS
- 22.21%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 32.63% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
PBA
Energy industry group
32.63%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- PBA
- 32.63%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WDS
Energy industry group
23.91%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WDS
- 23.91%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 12.10% | 7.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.65% | 2.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 24.78% | 22.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 32.63% | 23.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.23% | 34.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 5.34% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at -11.33% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.34% | -1.48% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.50% | -8.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -11.33% | -24.02% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -19.61% | -30.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PBA.
PBA
Energy industry group
0.75
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- PBA
- 0.75
- Min
- 0.24
WDS
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- WDS
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.80 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
PBA
Energy industry group
0.80
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- PBA
- 0.80
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- WDS
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.75 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.80 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.74 | 1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 6.13% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
PBA
Energy industry group
6.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- PBA
- 6.13%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
5.41%
- Max
- 8.57%
- WDS
- 5.41%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 86.79% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
PBA
Energy industry group
86.79%
- Max
- 133.24%
- PBA
- 86.79%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
69.78%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WDS
- 69.78%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 6.13% | 5.41% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 86.79% | 69.78% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 20.12 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
PBA
Energy industry group
20.12
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- PBA
- 20.12
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
WDS
Energy industry group
13.15
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- WDS
- 13.15
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 3.36 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
PBA
Energy industry group
3.36
- Max
- 5.40
- PBA
- 3.36
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
2.89
- Max
- 5.40
- WDS
- 2.89
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 2.55 carries an above-peer premium to book — PBA is pricier on assets.
PBA
Energy industry group
2.55
- Max
- 4.21
- PBA
- 2.55
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WDS
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- WDS
- 1.11
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 20.12 | 13.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.36 | 2.89 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.55 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 1.41% |