NOC vs. WWD: Northrop Grumman vs. Woodward Stock Comparison
How do Northrop Grumman (NOC) and Woodward (WWD) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Northrop Grumman (NOC) and Woodward (WWD) are both classified in the Aerospace & Defense sub-industry within the broader Aerospace & Defense industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | NOC | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Woodward, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 74.59 billion USD | 18.74 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | April 4, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | NOC | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -3.34% | 25.66% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 7.23% | 36.83% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 9.98% | 23.54% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Woodward (WWD) has a non-negative beta of 0.87.
| Metric | NOC | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 28.86% | 40.29% |
| Beta (5Y) | -0.12 | 0.87 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.80% | -37.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 902.47K | 665.85K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | NOC | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.26 | 0.53 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.37 | 0.85 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.07% and Woodward (WWD) at 22.34% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
26.07%
- Max
- 40.55%
- NOC
- 26.07%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
22.34%
- Max
- 40.55%
- WWD
- 22.34%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Woodward (WWD) at 13.17% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
10.37%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- NOC
- 10.37%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
13.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- WWD
- 13.17%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91% and Woodward (WWD) at 17.76% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
12.91%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- NOC
- 12.91%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
17.76%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- WWD
- 17.76%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | NOC | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 26.07% | 22.34% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.11% | 8.62% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.37% | 13.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.91% | 17.76% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.03% | 29.63% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% and Woodward (WWD) at 7.30% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% and Woodward (WWD) at 19.63% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | NOC | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.24% | 7.30% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.65% | 14.40% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 2.61% | 19.63% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -2.60% | 38.44% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Woodward (WWD) at 1.65 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for NOC.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- NOC
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- WWD
- 1.65
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 and Woodward (WWD) at 0.56 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
0.93
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- NOC
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
0.56
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- WWD
- 0.56
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | NOC | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.23 | 1.65 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.93 | 0.56 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.87 | 1.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.82% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Woodward (WWD) at 0.32% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, NOC the richer one.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.82%
- Max
- 2.66%
- NOC
- 1.82%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
0.32%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- WWD
- 0.32%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Woodward (WWD) at 13.35% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 30.18% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
30.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- NOC
- 30.18%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
13.35%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- WWD
- 13.35%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | NOC | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.82% | 0.32% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 30.18% | 13.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Woodward (WWD) at 35.30 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NOC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
16.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- NOC
- 16.57
- Min
- 3.03
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
35.30
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- WWD
- 35.30
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodward (WWD) at 4.47 sits in the pricier quartile — WWD costs more per dollar of sales.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.71
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- NOC
- 1.71
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
4.47
- Max
- 7.54
- WWD
- 4.47
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Woodward (WWD) at 7.60 carries an above-peer premium to book — WWD is pricier on assets.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
3.99
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- NOC
- 3.99
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
7.60
- Max
- 9.66
- WWD
- 7.60
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NOC | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.57 | 35.30 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.71 | 4.47 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.99 | 7.60 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.21% | 1.00% |