NOC vs. QXO: Northrop Grumman vs. QXO Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Northrop Grumman (NOC) and QXO (QXO) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense while QXO is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. QXO (QXO) has a non-negative beta of 2.28.

QXO (QXO) is heavily traded at around 19.01M shares per day, whereas Northrop Grumman (NOC) sees a more moderate 902.47K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

QXO (QXO) reports a negative ROE of -4.60%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports 26.07%, ranking against industry peers normally.

QXO (QXO) reports a negative net margin of -5.17%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports 10.37%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while QXO (QXO) at 1.29% operates in the bottom quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

QXO (QXO) at 11,924.96% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while QXO (QXO) at -672.73% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

QXO (QXO) at 4.12 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 and QXO (QXO) at 0.57 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a yield of 1.82%, ranking against industry peers normally.

QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a payout of 30.18%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at 16.57 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while QXO (QXO) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 and QXO (QXO) at 1.21 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

QXO (QXO) at 0.90 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 is valued near its industry’s middle — QXO is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics