NMR vs. WSE: Nomura vs. Wise Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Nomura (NMR) and Wise (WSE) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but NMR is classified in Capital Markets while WSE is classified in Financial Services.

Nomura (NMR) has been public since December 17, 2001, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Wise (WSE) listed only on May 11, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Wise (WSE) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both NMR and WSE need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Wise (WSE) at 27.23% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for WSE.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% and Wise (WSE) at 19.93% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Wise (WSE) at 59.77% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 24.36%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% and Wise (WSE) at 17.14% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% and Wise (WSE) at -5.78% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Wise (WSE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and Wise (WSE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Wise (WSE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports a yield of 620.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Wise (WSE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports a payout of 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 and Wise (WSE) at 23.23 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Wise (WSE) at 4.30 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Wise (WSE) at 5.94 carries an above-peer premium to book — WSE is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics